Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pessimistic expectations for Thursday night


dimbee

Recommended Posts

I just want the offense to come out sharp and move the ball...they don't need to score s ton or at all but I just want them to look good and play with some passion. They showed neither passion nor execution at fan fest.

And the defense just needs to keep playing with intensity and good things will happen.

It's just one practice game so my expectations are very simple.

if they don't look sharp I still don't think it is a concern. Life is just easy on a defense when Smitty ain't out there. Load up on the run and defend against fairly average WRs. Moore could have a hard time getting stuff going considering the recieving options. Considering it is preseason I doubt the are going to lean on Williams to get the ball rolling for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's worthwile to form expectations about the first preseason game or draw conclusions on the results given that the starters will only play for 1 or 2 series. I'd like to see our starters come out and move the ball well against them, but we're not an explosive offense (especially without Smitty) so I won't get too concerned if we go 3 and out in both series.

I'm much more interested to see if our 1st string defense (in the limited amount of playing time they'll have) can generate any pressure. To me, that is our biggest potential achillies heel this year.

We know we'll be able to run the ball which should open things up in the passing game and we have a QB that can take advantage of those opportunities now, so we should be okay on offense. The real question in my mind is whether or not we can generate enough pressure on defense to get off the field and allow our offense to control the clock and wear the opposing defense down.

I think there are folks who feel like we're going to be the greatest show on turf now that we have Matt Moore at QB and guys like LaFell and Edwards at WR. We're still going to be a run-first offense and that style of play doesn't show well in a 12 play series like Fan Fest or in a few series during the preseason. The 3rd preseason game, where our starters play at least 1/2 the game is the most telling. In 2008 we crushed the Skins and we were a playoff team, in 2009 we struggled against the Ravens and we were an 8-8 team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just excited to see everyone in game time situations. I think the offenses will be more productive as we both like to run the ball. Neither of the teams last night ran much and I think that affected how they played, if at least a little.

The QBs and WRs are going to be exciting to watch though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weren't we vanilla through game 8 last year?

The term vanilla was overused last preseason as a reason why we sucked, but in actuality, we sucked. Not because of lack of scheming but lack of aggression and motivation.

I differ on your opinion tho. I thought the Dallas game, from a defensive standpoint, we brought the chocolate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The term vanilla was overused last preseason as a reason why we sucked, but in actuality, we sucked. Not because of lack of scheming but lack of aggression and motivation.

I differ on your opinion tho. I thought the Dallas game, from a defensive standpoint, we brought the chocolate.

Actually we struggled early due to learning a new scheme and several injuries at DT. Aggression comes when you are familiar enough with a scheme that you react instead of think and then react. The increased aggression this year is a function of being in the same system for a second year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
    • Crosby will garner a haul in a trade. I would be reluctant to make that trade because of the following: 1. Our overall roster is awful. We cannot afford to be trading away valuable draft capital. 2. He isn't the best fit(IMO) for the scheme that Evero runs.  I love the player but it would really need to be at a reasonable deal and I think he is likely to garner an unreasonable price if he gets traded.
    • In terms of need, EDGE is currently #1. Our pass rush is near league worst levels. However, I don't subscribe to "need" based drafting. BPA all day.  We do need to dramatically upgrade over Scourton, Jones, Wonnum and Umanmielen. That is likely in the running for the NFL's worst two deep. Not saying all those players are bad, but I am saying 100% of those players are 2nd or 3rd stringers.
×
×
  • Create New...