Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I guess we will find out tomorrow why it's crucial to have 2 rb's.


pstall

Recommended Posts

I think 18 games would be the beginning of the end. The game is simply too physical and you're going to add wear and tear even moreso.

I absolutely love NFL football but 16 games is plenty (probably 2 games too many). I'd love to keep it at 16 and ditch 2 preseason games while we're at it.

Simply a case of greed on the owners part IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to keep it at 16 and ditch 2 preseason games while we're at it.

I agree, but don't see the league agreeing. Three preseason games is probably a bit more correct (since no one cares about the 4th), but it's all money.

The only way I can see the season extending is by increasing the roster size (as suggested earlier).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is clearly a money decision but unless the league changes things up, we will be headed for a lockout for sure. The owners are determined to make more money whether they are being greedy or not. An 18 game season would be doable if they agree to increase the roster limits from 53 to 58 players for example. After all wildcard teams that make it to the Superbowl play 4 preseason games and then a 20 game season. The teams most affected would be playoff teams who could play as many as 22 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fear the fickle ***** that is change.

Having said that, being a self-proclaimed schedule nerd, I like the system with the current schedule (division teams twice each, one division from NFC, one from AFC, and two other NFC teams). How would those extra two games be created without tearing a hole in the fabric of the space-time continuum????

1.21 GIGAWATTS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • They really would have been a perfect pairing of WRs as they're both so good, yet complete opposite types of players.  But with all our holes on defense, if Ladd showed the same potential had we drafted him, no way they could have justified going WR again, even I might have been against it (okay, we all know that's not true, I'd still haver taken my guy, but I'd at least have admitted it wasn't smart).    
    • They try so hard to be the smartest ones in the room rather than taking the players that are more obviously going to be good. I think that is largely driven by who the owner is. They want to do it "their" way, but their way has been wrong a whole lot more than it has been right. 
    • Run the ball 50 times, averaging 3ish yards per carry and hope like hell to limit their possessions. If they don't play keep-away, Atlanta is going to do to us what Double Trouble used to do to teams. They could put up 40 points and pass the ball less than 10 times.
×
×
  • Create New...