Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers on Tap featuring Mike Kaye

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted

Good listen. I appreciate Mike pointing out that the Milton Williams situation wasn't a debacle but instead overzealous reporting.

I also appreciate him pointing out that the HC and OC are both former WR coaches. If we don't believe they can develop WRs then what are we doing?

Also lots of cold water being dumped on having to get a WR1 this year.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Icege said:

Good listen. I appreciate Mike pointing out that the Milton Williams situation wasn't a debacle but instead overzealous reporting.

I also appreciate him pointing out that the HC and OC are both former WR coaches. If we don't believe they can develop WRs then what are we doing?

Also lots of cold water being dumped on having to get a WR1 this year.

Similar takeaways.  I think there's cold water being dumped on any receiving targets WR/TE in R1/2.  

Now, if someone like Noel or Bech lasts to 57, that could be a fun choice, but I'm beginning to expect mid-to-later WR/RB/TE adds...seems primed for defense or trenches with first 2-3 picks.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted (edited)

Why does Kaye downplay Wharton as only a rotational pass rusher when he played 61% of the snaps to Milton Williams 48%.

 

Wharton outproduced or matched Williams in sacks, tackles, tackles for loss, and qb hits.

Edited by csx
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

Similar takeaways.  I think there's cold water being dumped on any receiving targets WR/TE in R1/2.  

Now, if someone like Noel or Bech lasts to 57, that could be a fun choice, but I'm beginning to expect mid-to-later WR/RB/TE adds...seems primed for defense or trenches with first 2-3 picks.  

I'm fine if it plays out that way I just hope we don't go into the draft with any firm blueprints. If a pass catcher is the BPA then draft him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Icege said:

Good listen. I appreciate Mike pointing out that the Milton Williams situation wasn't a debacle but instead overzealous reporting.

I also appreciate him pointing out that the HC and OC are both former WR coaches. If we don't believe they can develop WRs then what are we doing?

Also lots of cold water being dumped on having to get a WR1 this year.

 

I've said it a few times-

Proud Saved By The Bell GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Hes Short as Hell but Man I Like This Kid

      By TD alt · Posted

      Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • TD alt
      This Video was Eye Opening To me

      By TD alt · Posted

      Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
    • TD alt
      This Video was Eye Opening To me

      By TD alt · Posted

      Very interesting indeed. It did make my head swim more. It said a lot, but it still didn't give any concrete answers. Kinda makes me want to pivot back towards a premium position though...
×
×
  • Create New...