Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our Offense - The question of the Pre-Season


hepcat

Recommended Posts

I know it's only preseason, but so far the offense has been cause to worry. I think we could all agree that outside of DeAngelo Williams, there have been few bright spots.

My question - Is the lack of offense this preseason:

-A product of preseason game planning (holding the real plans back for the regular season)

-Playing to keep everybody healthy (players not taking many risks - even though Matt Moore has gotten hammered a few times)

-Playing two of the top defenses in the league (NYJ were #1 and Baltimore was the #3 defense last year)

-Missing key starters (Stewart, Smith, Otah)

-Succumbing to the youth movement?

I just remember the throttling the '08 Panthers gave the Redskins that preseason and knew that they had some things clicking on offense. But this year and last, the preseason has been pitiful. You can't judge a season based on a few preseason games and there is still time to pick up some steam. I'm just hoping for a TD out of the starters this Saturday...just to show that there is some life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only issue I have with "we're not really game planning" is that either is the other team. So great, we'll finally start "bringing it" come the Giants. Well...so will they. What if the Jets had game planned more? Heck, the Ravens put points on the board against us without a game plan. I think that speaks volumes, that we can barely even take the ball down the field. Tomorrow will answer a lot, though. I look forward to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between not game planning on defense and not game planning on offense. On offense they are evaluating a certain play, route running, blocking, timing, so on and so forth. A huge part of the evaluation for a defense, however, is calls on the line by the mike and making adjustments to the offense. While they may not be calling specific formation based on game planning, the defense is definitely making adjustments to the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox has said there will be some game planning this game but having said that

I want to see some chemistry between the qb and receivers.Lets see if the OL can protect the qb.I am sure they will be game planning our running game so it will be interesting what that does for our passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we kicked Washington's ass, that was the 3rd preseason game. So maybe on this 3rd preseason game we will do the same to Tennessee.... maybe.

Washington had a horrible run defense that year. Our team was hot all preseason up to that point. 08 is a good example of what preseason means, you come out strong and start winning games week 1, not mid season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox has said there will be some game planning this game but having said that

I want to see some chemistry between the qb and receivers.Lets see if the OL can protect the qb.I am sure they will be game planning our running game so it will be interesting what that does for our passing game.

If we want to see more chemistry between the quarterback and receivers, we have to put the receivers in for more than a few plays at a time. So far we have shuttled guys in and out just about every series. Plus we need to throw the ball more not less if we want to see some rhythm. Running 2 plays and throwing on third down doesn't build chemistry. Now if you want sustained drives, running may be the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Playing two of the top defenses in the league (NYJ were #1 and Baltimore was the #3 defense last year)

I think the coaches are still more focused on learning what we can do in different situations than in moving the ball.

This is what I want to believe. :patriot:

Since the third game is the game closest to a real game, I hope we come out have have a lights out offence....

Ten 3

Car 22

oh come on, 22 points is lights out for us. :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...