Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

could double troubles' problem be their hesitation?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

I just spent the last two hours watching game film of the 2008 season (and reminiscing about celebrating victory after victory. :( ) I paid close attention to the backs - Deangelo Williams in his first year as a starter and Jonathan Stewart as a rookie... and noticed a pretty big difference between that year and the current one.

Specifically, there was no hesitation on the part of either of them. Unless it was a misdirection play, there was very little twinkle-toe maneuvers going on. They attacked the hole, following the blockers, ran straight downhill.

This year has been quite different. Both backs have been hesitating. They dance around in the backfield. Shitty blocking is obviously a factor, but the holes that do open close a moment later - a split second too late for a hesitating back who could've been ten yards down the field and is now dropped for a loss.

If we're going to take advantage of a shaky New Orleans defense this sunday, all three backs and damn well better be prepared to bolt without a second thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't hesitation, that is what backs do especially in a zone blocking scheme. They have to wait for the hole to open which looks to the fan as hesistation. In 2008 we were clearing bigger holes and piledriving folks. With teams run blitzing and filling in the gaps this year, there aren't running lanes and Williams and Stewart and trying to find some daylight. Running stright ahead with no daylight is just pounding a wall. It gets you nowhere.

What else is different? Fiametta is no Hoover and can't ram through the line and create holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most of the hesitation is related to the lack of holes being opened this year, but it's also clear to me that JStew is not 100% in game shape at the moment (which shouldn't be a surprise).

I'm concerned about the o-line not opening holes but I'm not concerned about JStew, he got better with each touch during the Bengals game and will continue to progress.

I haven't focused much on Fiametta, but I'm going to go back and see how this kid is playing... he may be part of the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't hesitation, that is what backs do especially in a zone blocking scheme. They have to wait for the hole to open which looks to the fan as hesistation. In 2008 we were clearing bigger holes and piledriving folks. With teams run blitzing and filling in the gaps this year, there aren't running lanes and Williams and Stewart and trying to find some daylight. Running stright ahead with no daylight is just pounding a wall. It gets you nowhere.

What else is different? Fiametta is no Hoover and can't ram through the line and create holes.

Ding Ding we have a winner.

As big and stout as he is Hoover was playing lights out when our run game was in full force. They don't trust Fiametta as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, it's Fiametta. Hoover was the unsung MVP of this team. They hesitate bc the hole they're supposed to go through is not there. Thus they have to readjust.

I know on Williams 2 longest runs, so far, Fiametta sprung him both times, rememember him laying out the middle LB for the Giants? However, you are right, he does seem to disappear at times.

Looks to me the holes are created by Kalil and Wharton, nothing over tackle. Who remembers those huge runs to the right side last year? We have to get the run game going to beat the Saints, even if it means adding an extra OL lined up as a TE.

Noticed also, neither are breaking a lot of tackles this year, compared to last year and where's the emotion we had last year? I see Goodson showing it after runs, but not D'LO or Stew. I would prefer they leave one back in for a whole drive, then switch up on the next. The 2 back system, worked last year, but a 3 back system usually spells doom, (see Giants) I see Goodson getting a lot of action late in the game, is that causing some animosity? :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen this with Stewart a number of times, not as much with Williams. Stew actually seems to start dancing around even when he's got a hole sometimes. There were a couple points that instead of plowing forward he tried to go sideways, and it cost him a couple yards. While in the grand scheme of things I doubt it made a difference, it was still frustrating to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The HB's don't trust the o-line or the FB yet. That is one problem. However with three backs sharing carries no one gets into a rhythm. That is the biggest problem. Most people though that this was the biggest problem with two backs a few years ago. D-will and J-Stew seemed to overcome that by becoming a team of RB's rather than a pair of RB's. With Goodson thrown in so much they are just three RB's taking turns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the honesty in your posts--I am not sure Canales is rusing(?) because I don't think we are good enough yet to draft players for depth on day 1.  I do think we are in limbo, fwiw.  At 19, I think you are drafting second rounders in the first.
    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
×
×
  • Create New...