Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Despite all of the love of James Anderson here....


Zod

Recommended Posts

The defense did not play well. We gave up 400 yards of offense. Worse we missed a number of tackles so that a no name group of backs rushed for over 120 yards. If it weren't for 2 fumbles by the Saints we would have been down 24-7 at the half. Sure they were on the field all day but that was as much thier fault as anything. They gave up 27 first downs. They allowed the Saints to convert 60% of their third downs. Brees finished with 70% completion rate. If not for the fourth quarter when he missed 6 passes. He was set for a completion rate of 80%.

Our secondary was awful. We were flagged for interference penalties and could have been flagged for at least 3 more.

By comparison we had less than 300 yards offense with 118 running and 133 net yards passing. We converted 30% of our third downs.

Honestly the offense was awful and the passing game was poor. Most of those passing yards came on one busted play throw to Stewart. Otherwise he threw for around 75 yards. Truth is that this was an awful game and we played poorly. If it weren't for the Saints letting us hand around this game would have been decided by halftime.

The lack of clarity around here is amazing. Folks this is a bad team and this offense is the worse we have even fielded through 4 games. The worse ever!!!! Even Weinke was better than Clausen at this point. At the end of his first 2 games our offense was averaging twice what is in under Clausen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense did not play well. We gave up 400 yards of offense. Worse we missed a number of tackles so that a no name group of backs rushed for over 120 yards. If it weren't for 2 fumbles by the Saints we would have been down 24-7 at the half. Sure they were on the field all day but that was as much thier fault as anything. They gave up 27 first downs. They allowed the Saints to convert 60% of their third downs. Brees finished with 70% completion rate. If not for the fourth quarter when he missed 6 passes. He was set for a completion rate of 80%.

Our secondary was awful. We were flagged for interference penalties and could have been flagged for at least 3 more.

By comparison we had less than 300 yards offense with 118 running and 133 net yards passing. We converted 30% of our third downs.

Honestly the offense was awful and the passing game was poor. Most of those passing yards came on one busted play throw to Stewart. Otherwise he threw for around 75 yards. Truth is that this was an awful game and we played poorly. If it weren't for the Saints letting us hand around this game would have been decided by halftime.

The lack of clarity around here is amazing. Folks this is a bad team and this offense is the worse we have even fielded through 4 games. The worse ever!!!! Even Weinke was better than Clausen at this point. At the end of his first 2 games our offense was averaging twice what is in under Clausen.

You didn't mention Moore. Go back and edit. Wait...you did, in a way. My bad. Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense did not play well. We gave up 400 yards of offense. Worse we missed a number of tackles so that a no name group of backs rushed for over 120 yards. If it weren't for 2 fumbles by the Saints we would have been down 24-7 at the half. Sure they were on the field all day but that was as much thier fault as anything. They gave up 27 first downs. They allowed the Saints to convert 60% of their third downs. Brees finished with 70% completion rate. If not for the fourth quarter when he missed 6 passes. He was set for a completion rate of 80%.

Our secondary was awful. We were flagged for interference penalties and could have been flagged for at least 3 more.

By comparison we had less than 300 yards offense with 118 running and 133 net yards passing. We converted 30% of our third downs.

Honestly the offense was awful and the passing game was poor. Most of those passing yards came on one busted play throw to Stewart. Otherwise he threw for around 75 yards. Truth is that this was an awful game and we played poorly. If it weren't for the Saints letting us hand around this game would have been decided by halftime.

The lack of clarity around here is amazing. Folks this is a bad team and this offense is the worse we have even fielded through 4 games. The worse ever!!!! Even Weinke was better than Clausen at this point. At the end of his first 2 games our offense was averaging twice what is in under Clausen.

Great post for the most part. But, the first paragraph about the defense is a lot of 'what ifs.' Yeah, it could've been 24-7 at the half, but we DID create those fumbles. I know it doesn't negate how they were driving at will before that, but it still happened. You have to give the guys credit for that yesterday - when they actually hit the guys, they were slobber knockers.

Other than that, I agree with everything you said. That's why I posed the question I did in my thread 'Clausen vs Bradford." I have no personal agenda for who starts here, I want the best guy and whoever can win the game for us to play. But, I don't get all the praise everyone is giving Clausen. I've seen several plays where Smitty was crossing the field on a drag or slant and he had already locked onto a receiver and got rid of the ball quickly even when there wasn't any immediate pressure on him.

As I've mentioned several times, he doesn't appear to want to take any chance throwing downfield or letting a play fully develop... To play the 'what if' game here, if the Saints didn't think our offense was laughable that they completely ignored JStew coming out of the backfield and blew their coverage, Clausen wouldn't have thrown a TD yesterday. As you said, without that pass, his stats are fairly bad.

It's hard to tell what exactly it is, but no doubt, there's a combination of things contributing to how bad this offense is, and until some of that gets cleaned up, I'm not sure what Clausen is capable of, and I doubt anyone else is either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zod is right Thomas Davis is definitely better. The real questions are:

-Will Davis be the same again?

-If Davis is the same, who is the odd man out, Connor or Anderson?

Although I love me some Dan Connor I believe Beason moves back to the middle and Anderson and Connor rotate at the SAM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if davis comes back healthy we have 3-4 talent a the LB position, if the season is a wash they really need to experiment with hybrid packages with all four of them on the field and 3 big DT bodies as NT and DE to get a pass rush going...cause our DL is poo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no question Davis is better than Anderson.

The actual question is what would be the best configuration.

Possibilities:

MLB Connor

SLB Anderson

WLB Beason

MLB Beason

SLB Anderson

WLB Davis

MLB Connor

SLB Davis

WLB Beason

MLB Beason

SLB Connor

WLB Davis

There are other possibilities too, but those are the ones I give the most credence.

For the record, Anderson and Davis have each played both outside positions in the past. Anderson is currently strong side while Davis was slotted for the weak side (he played there last year) before being injured again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If, and that's a big if, Davis comes back 100%, then this time next year we will be having the same arguments that we have this year about running backs. We'll have a huge talent in Connor that is just sitting on the bench. And any of you who think we have LB talent to play 3-4 know nothing about 3-4 defense. Norwood is about the only LB we have that even has a 3-4 OLB build, and he never sees the field so we don't even know what we have there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was also caught out of position on several runs and allowed big gains. Brown had the edge contained, James was late in getting outside the tackle, result: 10-15 yards.

Every player in the NFL is going to get out of place at some point during the game. No defensive player is going to be able to stop every single play, be in the right place every single snap, or make all the amazing plays every single time. Not James Anderson, not Ray Lewis, not Mike Singletary, not Lawrence Taylor. No one.

He had 16 tackles, a forced fumble, and two fumble recoveries. The dude is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...