Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I want Andrew Luck


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

This is not my prediction, it's not who i think you people should want, it's just who i want. I saw the kid play a year back or so and was instantly impressed. I could not wait until he was eligible to be drafted. this year there's a chance we can get him if he declares. I want him (no homo, not that there's anything wrong with that).

yes we have Jimmy, yes we have Matt, and it is waaaaaaaaay too early to declare jimmy a bust, but honestly, i don't want the kid. I was pissed when they drafted him, I wish him the best, but dammit his last name isn't luck so i'm not happy.

think about the possible fan signs we could have-

"All you need is a little LUCK"

"We've got Luck on our side" and then put a shamrock right next to it, is he irish? who cares. It doesn't matter, because it just works.

call me an idiot, a douche, a retard, I don't care. just my personal choice for who i want under center for the next 10+ years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bills will have the #1 pick and take him, Hurney is still here and won't take a QB with his first pick in consecutive years, Patrick Peterson is the BPA of the draft, a need, and the best CB prospect to come out since Darrelle Revis.

But yeah, besides that we should totally get Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It still baffles me how so many people think that Luck is the savior for this team after Clausen shredded Stanford in his last college game in 2009. Playing well in college does not guarantee you will light it up on a bad team in the NFL. Go look at Stafford's numbers in Detroit (who by the way I would take any day of the week over Bradford).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It still baffles me how so many people think that Luck is the savior for this team after Clausen shredded Stanford in his last college game in 2009. Playing well in college does not guarantee you will light it up on a bad team in the NFL. Go look at Stafford's numbers in Detroit (who by the way I would take any day of the week over Bradford).

yeah but luck didn't play defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not my prediction, it's not who i think you people should want, it's just who i want. I saw the kid play a year back or so and was instantly impressed. I could not wait until he was eligible to be drafted. this year there's a chance we can get him if he declares. I want him (no homo, not that there's anything wrong with that).

yes we have Jimmy, yes we have Matt, and it is waaaaaaaaay too early to declare jimmy a bust, but honestly, i don't want the kid. I was pissed when they drafted him, I wish him the best, but dammit his last name isn't luck so i'm not happy.

think about the possible fan signs we could have-

"All you need is a little LUCK"

"We've got Luck on our side" and then put a shamrock right next to it, is he irish? who cares. It doesn't matter, because it just works.

call me an idiot, a douche, a retard, I don't care. just my personal choice for who i want under center for the next 10+ years.

I am inclined to agree with you Cracka McNasty,so what,in your opinion,does Luck bring to the Game that Clausen doesn't and how would you rate his upside compared to Clausen.

The reason i ask these questions is i know very little about Luck and have never seen him play,just heard others talk about him. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bills will have the #1 pick and take him, Hurney is still here and won't take a QB with his first pick in consecutive years, Patrick Peterson is the BPA of the draft, a need, and the best CB prospect to come out since Darrelle Revis.

But yeah, besides that we should totally get Luck.

i see what you're saying, we will have a bigger need at CB and possibly DL, I understand that, I just reaaaaaaally want Luck badly...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am inclined to agree with you Cracka McNasty,so what,in your opinion,does Luck bring to the Game that Clausen doesn't and how would you rate his upside compared to Clausen.

The reason i ask these questions is i know very little about Luck and have never seen him play,just heard others talk about him. Thanks

kid has great poise, he just looks like a leader (might not actually be one, but if he isn't, he's a great actor). Great Size 6-4", above average arm, and mobile. He's inexperienced but he really just seems to have a tremendous upside. He just seems to have that "it" factor. I didn't see it in Clausen and I don't see it in Jake Locker.

then again, i am not a professional scout nor do i claim to be. Just my opinion of the kid.

more on him here:

http://www.nepatriotsdraft.com/2010/05/andrew-luck-scouting-report.html

http://draftace.com/blog/2010/05/12/a-early-scouting-report-on-andrew-luck/

http://nflmocks.com/2010/06/30/2011-nfl-draft-scouting-report-andrew-luck-stanford/

http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=8&c=1&nid=2741838

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...