Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if you were the coach?


CarolinaCatBrigade

Recommended Posts

I like the run first offense with play action passes offense we run now. I wouldn't really change it, I would just take more of a proactive, rather than reactive approach. Ny core belief is that you have to keep the opposition guessing and on their toes.

Smith would become a slot receiver with Gettis and someone else as the X and Y WR's. More screens and end arounds to utilize the speed we have with Gettis, Goodson, Clowney, Smith and AE.

We'd still run the ball, but not as predictably as now.

Audibles would be a big thing, once the D commits and extra man to the run we switch to a quick pass.

Most exciting O? Nope, but I think it would be effective and keep more exciting O's off the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the run first offense with play action passes offense we run now. I wouldn't really change it, I would just take more of a proactive, rather than reactive approach. Ny core belief is that you have to keep the opposition guessing and on their toes.

Smith would become a slot receiver with Gettis and someone else as the X and Y WR's. More screens and end arounds to utilize the speed we have with Gettis, Goodson, Clowney, Smith and AE.

We'd still run the ball, but not as predictably as now.

Audibles would be a big thing, once the D commits and extra man to the run we switch to a quick pass.

Most exciting O? Nope, but I think it would be effective and keep more exciting O's off the field.

You forgot "Get the TE's more involved in the passing game, using a strong formation '64 Out' to gain separation in the middle behind the Mike on zone D plays." (Hell, it always worked on Tecmobowl.... :D)

For illustration:

ac7a66106518453.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...