Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where are all the AE lovers?


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

Honestly, with Vicks performance last night I figured there would be a dozen threads on the front page about how he needs to play QB for us because he was better at App than Vick was at VT. Instead, all morning and nada.

I'm really disappointed. In both of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, with Vicks performance last night I figured there would be a dozen threads on the front page about how he needs to play QB for us because he was better at App than Vick was at VT. Instead, all morning and nada.

I'm really disappointed. In both of you.

You missed last week where the poster "GoApps70" claimed that Armanti was more accurate than Vick and "just as fast".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is stupid. Our coaching staff is too idiotic to even consider playing AE so it does not really matter in the first place. At some point in a wasted and pointless garbage season it would make sense to try out all your players to make sure you dont have a idamond in the rough somewhere but all fox cares about is updating his resume and getting the hell out of dodge. Glad to see some fans are still the mindless sheep they always are and wouldnt even consider something like that. What does it hurt a 1-8 team just to throw him in on some plays to see what they have? Youre right absolutely nothing. Im no AE homer but wouldnt bitch and moan like some of these girls in this thread if they were to just try the concept out and see how it goes. Closed minded idiots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You missed last week where the poster "GoApps70" claimed that Armanti was more accurate than Vick and "just as fast".

Armanti was more accurate than Vick was in college, but Vick looked like a machine last night....in a rainstorm!

I would love for the coaches to let Armanti run the Panthers normal 2 minute drill for a couple of series during the game on Sunday...what in the world do the Panthers have to lose? It would make the game exciting for the fans instead of run, run, pass, punt.

Cam Newton is currently projected as a 2nd round pick....with the way Vick is playing this year, I think he will probably go in the mid to late first.

Maybe the Panthers could trade their top pick for a mid 1st and couple of 3rd round picks...and pick up Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...