Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodson is a father...


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Per Rotoworld:

pixel.gifpixel.gif

Panthers RB Mike Goodson missed a second straight practice Thursday for personal reasons.

Goodson is attending to the birth of his child, and coach John Fox fully expects him to play Sunday. The Seahawks run defense has fallen apart since mid-October, allowing 190+ yards in three of the past five weeks. It should be easy sledding for Goodson and Jonathan Stewart.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&filter_teams=CAR&id=5281

Seahawks defense has been allowing 5 yards per carry, so hopefully Goodson can be their daddy on Sunday as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure you want Goodson to have a big day with that Luck Sig?lol

LOL, I'm very conflicted right now...

I want to see Stewart and Goodson do well, but I also want DeAngelo back.

I don't want to root for us to lose, but I want us to be in a position to draft Luck.

:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, I'm very conflicted right now...

I want to see Stewart and Goodson do well, but I also want DeAngelo back.

I don't want to root for us to lose, but I want us to be in a position to draft Luck.

:confused:

Same here. Its a sucky situation hoping your players do well but not too well LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, I'm very conflicted right now...

I want to see Stewart and Goodson do well, but I also want DeAngelo back.

I don't want to root for us to lose, but I want us to be in a position to draft Luck.

:confused:

Here is the problem.. Assuming we win one more game this year and none of the 2 win teams currently win another game, we would draft 4th based on current Strength of Schedule. We have to pretty much lose out to ensure we get the #1 pick and are in the Luck sweepstakes. Buffalo has the highest Strength of Schedule, so they'd pick first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the problem.. Assuming we win one more game this year and none of the 2 win teams currently win another game, we would draft 4th based on current Strength of Schedule. We have to pretty much lose out to ensure we get the #1 pick and are in the Luck sweepstakes. Buffalo has the highest Strength of Schedule, so they'd pick first.

I stand to be corrected but isn't it a game of opposites determining the draft picks?

In other words,the team with the weaker schedule would pick ahead of the team with the stronger schedule in case of a tie. Just asking.

Also,the Bengals beat us thereby giving us the tie breaker over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand to be corrected but isn't it a game of opposites determining the draft picks?

In other words,the team with the weaker schedule would pick ahead of the team with the stronger schedule in case of a tie. Just asking.

Also,the Bengals beat us thereby giving us the tie breaker over them.

Actually you are right.. I guess they believe if you cant beat crappy teams you deserve to get the pick. I'd think playing a harder schedule would get it. I guess we "Luck"ed out getting the NFC west this year lol.

The draft tiebreakers are as follows:

1) Super Bowl Winner picks 32nd

2) Super Bowl Loser picks 31st

3) Teams are ranked in inverse order of their record. Ties count as a half win and half loss.

4) A playoff team always picks after a non-playoff team with the same regular season record. If two playoff teams have the same regular season record, but one was eliminated in an earlier round, that team picks first.

5) Ties are then broken using strength of schedule (average of all 16 opponent's winning percentage, divisionmates count twice since they were played twice. Or count the wins of all opponents, same result). Weaker schedule picks earlier.

6) If SOS fails to break the tie, and the teams are in the same division, apply the division playoff tiebreakers (except the "loser" picks higher).

7) If SOS fails to break the tie, the teams are not in the same division, but the teams are in the same conference, apply the conference playoff tiebreakers (except the "loser" picks higher).

8) If the teams are still tied, or are in different conferences, a coin toss decides the order. If three teams are tied such that the tie can be broken as to two teams, but not between any of those two and a third team, the "loser" of the two-team tie flips against the other team first. A scenario where all three teams are stone tied is nearly impossible since there are only two conferences and intraconference tiebreakers go very deep before a coin flip.

http://www.east-coast-bias.com/2009/12/2010-nfl-draft-order-strength-of.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...