Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodson is a father...


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Per Rotoworld:

pixel.gifpixel.gif

Panthers RB Mike Goodson missed a second straight practice Thursday for personal reasons.

Goodson is attending to the birth of his child, and coach John Fox fully expects him to play Sunday. The Seahawks run defense has fallen apart since mid-October, allowing 190+ yards in three of the past five weeks. It should be easy sledding for Goodson and Jonathan Stewart.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&filter_teams=CAR&id=5281

Seahawks defense has been allowing 5 yards per carry, so hopefully Goodson can be their daddy on Sunday as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure you want Goodson to have a big day with that Luck Sig?lol

LOL, I'm very conflicted right now...

I want to see Stewart and Goodson do well, but I also want DeAngelo back.

I don't want to root for us to lose, but I want us to be in a position to draft Luck.

:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, I'm very conflicted right now...

I want to see Stewart and Goodson do well, but I also want DeAngelo back.

I don't want to root for us to lose, but I want us to be in a position to draft Luck.

:confused:

Same here. Its a sucky situation hoping your players do well but not too well LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, I'm very conflicted right now...

I want to see Stewart and Goodson do well, but I also want DeAngelo back.

I don't want to root for us to lose, but I want us to be in a position to draft Luck.

:confused:

Here is the problem.. Assuming we win one more game this year and none of the 2 win teams currently win another game, we would draft 4th based on current Strength of Schedule. We have to pretty much lose out to ensure we get the #1 pick and are in the Luck sweepstakes. Buffalo has the highest Strength of Schedule, so they'd pick first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the problem.. Assuming we win one more game this year and none of the 2 win teams currently win another game, we would draft 4th based on current Strength of Schedule. We have to pretty much lose out to ensure we get the #1 pick and are in the Luck sweepstakes. Buffalo has the highest Strength of Schedule, so they'd pick first.

I stand to be corrected but isn't it a game of opposites determining the draft picks?

In other words,the team with the weaker schedule would pick ahead of the team with the stronger schedule in case of a tie. Just asking.

Also,the Bengals beat us thereby giving us the tie breaker over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand to be corrected but isn't it a game of opposites determining the draft picks?

In other words,the team with the weaker schedule would pick ahead of the team with the stronger schedule in case of a tie. Just asking.

Also,the Bengals beat us thereby giving us the tie breaker over them.

Actually you are right.. I guess they believe if you cant beat crappy teams you deserve to get the pick. I'd think playing a harder schedule would get it. I guess we "Luck"ed out getting the NFC west this year lol.

The draft tiebreakers are as follows:

1) Super Bowl Winner picks 32nd

2) Super Bowl Loser picks 31st

3) Teams are ranked in inverse order of their record. Ties count as a half win and half loss.

4) A playoff team always picks after a non-playoff team with the same regular season record. If two playoff teams have the same regular season record, but one was eliminated in an earlier round, that team picks first.

5) Ties are then broken using strength of schedule (average of all 16 opponent's winning percentage, divisionmates count twice since they were played twice. Or count the wins of all opponents, same result). Weaker schedule picks earlier.

6) If SOS fails to break the tie, and the teams are in the same division, apply the division playoff tiebreakers (except the "loser" picks higher).

7) If SOS fails to break the tie, the teams are not in the same division, but the teams are in the same conference, apply the conference playoff tiebreakers (except the "loser" picks higher).

8) If the teams are still tied, or are in different conferences, a coin toss decides the order. If three teams are tied such that the tie can be broken as to two teams, but not between any of those two and a third team, the "loser" of the two-team tie flips against the other team first. A scenario where all three teams are stone tied is nearly impossible since there are only two conferences and intraconference tiebreakers go very deep before a coin flip.

http://www.east-coast-bias.com/2009/12/2010-nfl-draft-order-strength-of.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're assuming just as well.   Morgan and Canales were hired 3 days apart.  I believe it was partially due to their connections in Seattle.  i believe Tepper wanted some familiarity with his GM and HC.  It is so easy to sit back and arm-chair QB over draft picks.  You don't know what the philosophy was going into the 2024 draft.  I believe Canales and Morgan were drafting for the future.  XL and Brooks point to that philosophy. Name me one GM that is 100% on draft picks.  Just one.  You're not going to find one.    I think year one picks weren't for what can you do for me now but Potential.   XL hasn't lived up to the hype of a 1st rounder.  I think we all can agree on that. However, there still is hope he comes around.  What I believe they saw in him was his speed after the catch.  He needs to get more consistent but when he gets the ball you kind of hold your breath just a second because if he gets free, he's gone.  The Brooks pick was a signing for the future, and no one could have guessed he would re-injure the same ACL.  This makes the pick look bad but Dallas was ready to draft him later that same round.  IMO we'll have to see what happens next season before we can call this a bust. Wallace has improved each season and for a third rounder has done well.  Sanders has shown flashes and considering the pick in the 4th round it wasn't a bad pick.  His sophomore season IMO was a little bit more productive.  Smith-Wade has been a good addition and has played well.  For a 5th round pick to get as much playing time as he has.  Most picks below round 3 should take a couple of years to get up to speed.  He's been a decent player.  Crumedy, no comment We turned Barrett into Jackson.  This was an amazing move and basically got a starting CB for a 7th round pick.  Pretty shrewd if you ask me. Coker, maybe the best Free Agent signing of the 2024 draft class. So, in short, you can't say that the draft was a bust.  It isn't a home run but all but one are still on the team and outside of Brooks have made contributions to wins.  2025 draft class has been much better with almost every pick making contributions this season.  Now take Fitterer's two years and compare them to Morgan and tell me that they have the same philosophy. 
    • He hasn’t led crap, he’s on loaded teams and a piece of the puzzle. And he’s he has improved drastically but it took the ultimate QB whispers in Shanahan and KOC. You put him on this Panther team and he’s back to normal Darnold 
    • Slavin and Jarvis week to week. Florida cheap shots took out our two best players.  I’d start KK so he can beat the brakes off someone.  
×
×
  • Create New...