Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade #1/Luck...to who, and how much?

jpniner

By jpniner,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jpniner Newbie

jpniner

Posted
Posted

How much would it take for you to be 'ok' with trading #1/Luck?

My guess is the one team who may give up alot for Luck, is San Francisco(rumored to be going after Harbaugh as well). They will have a good draft pick as part of the trade, what else will it take(Picks and players) to be okay with it?

Possibly Arizona or Seattle would be in position and need at QB to make such a move, and never rule out the Raiders in something crazy. Jerry Jones may offer Romo and lots of picks possibly.

San Frans 1st, 2nd, 3rd this year and 1st next year plus some Dline and/or WR help? Possibly V. Davis?

If Luck truly is as good a prospect as Peyton Manning, some team will offer a Herchel Walker trade, and it will be tempting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

Given this scenario, a QB would have to be in consideration from the team. People here would definitely be pissed to get a Troy Smith instead of a Luck.

I think the bigger question is if Luck doesn't declare, who the hell would want to trade up to number one for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

Nothing.... All those team would want to trade up because they know the value of a franchise QB.... The same reason we tried to trade up and get Peyton Manning.... Unless Somebody wants to give us Rodgers, or another Pro-Bowl QB I'll pass.

I want Carolina to be set up at the position, not help give another team a franchise QB.... We have the #1 pick, they can get whatever leftover QB we don't want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA Mentor

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted

49ers want him bad

something like this could be on the table

2011: 1st rounder (around 5th overall), 2nd

2012: 1st, 3rd

2013: 2nd, 3rd

with a couple later round picks thrown in as well.

doubt a big time player gets thrown in. most value would just be the picks, any players would be backups or guys they just want to unload bad contracts.

kinda hard deal to pass up, you have to really be sure luck is the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

49ers want him bad

something like this could be on the table

2011: 1st rounder (around 5th overall), 2nd

2012: 1st, 3rd

2013: 2nd, 3rd

with a couple later round picks thrown in as well.

doubt a big time player gets thrown in. most value would just be the picks, any players would be backups or guys they just want to unload bad contracts.

kinda hard deal to pass up, you have to really be sure luck is the guy.

I'd throw Isaac Sopoaga and Josh Morgan in there

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Saltman Apprentice

The Saltman

Posted
Posted

49ers want him bad

something like this could be on the table

2011: 1st rounder (around 5th overall), 2nd

2012: 1st, 3rd

2013: 2nd, 3rd

with a couple later round picks thrown in as well.

doubt a big time player gets thrown in. most value would just be the picks, any players would be backups or guys they just want to unload bad contracts.

kinda hard deal to pass up, you have to really be sure luck is the guy.

i would take that in a heartbeat
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Why are you so sold on Luck?

Because NFL scouts are sold on him like they haven't been sold on anyone since Peyton Manning.

(people thinking that other guys scouting reports have been just as good clearly haven't read them)

Confirmed by watching him myself every time I've had the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Remaining Schedule

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      So we have a pretty tough schedule for the remainder of the season.  I believe I saw where it's the toughest remaining schedule in the league.  To even think about the playoffs we IMO have to, at minimum, win three of the remaining six.  49ers - We will have to play an amazing game to win this one.  We are down to backups at LB (at least for now) and Kittle is probably going to have a big day.  CMC must not go off on us.  PFF had a pregame analysis and actually the two guys running the show were split on who wins.  They even said it was disrespectful to the Panthers to be 7pt underdog.  Evero is going to have to have a great gameplan.   I'm on the fence but this game is in SF and I think we lose. Rams - We're at home that is about the only advantage I see in this game.  LA is one of the best offenses in the league and I just don't think we have the firepower to beat them.  The only way we win is if we can control the clock and keep LA's offense off the field. Saints - We have to go into this game on a mission.  WE HAVE TO WIN THIS GAME.  Hopefully, Canales has a better gameplan and we win.  This is a very winnable game. TB x 2 - The only chance, IMO, of winning the NFCS is we have to win both games.  Many talking heads say TB is faltering some and can be had.  By week 15 and 17 we should be hitting on all cylinders.  If we win, it's going to have to be a pretty mistake free. Seahawks - they have a very tough defense, and I think we get shut down.  Our only hope is to pressure Darnold into mistakes like he did this past weekend with 4 INTs.  As with the Rams we are going to have to keep this a low scoring game. My hope is  49ers- Win Rams - Loss Saints - Win Bucs@Home - Win Seattle - Loss Bucs@TB - Loss 9-8 Record My Fear 49ers-Loss Rams-Loss Saints-Win Bucs@home - Loss Seahawks - Loss Bucs@TB - Loss 7-10 record
    • mrcompletely11
      ESPN’s Benjamin Solak on Panthers LT

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      With Motons deal (stupid), Hunt, Lewis and Mayes and Icky upcoming our line is going to be the most expensive again in the nfl.   Its going to be an interesting snap shot if this type of team building works. 
    • Bear Hands
      Hubbard says he might have rushed back

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      We have an easy out after this season with marginal dead cap. Could be smart given the situation and RB landscape.  This part isn’t at you—but in general: None of these guys are world beaters — sure they have been great for us at times but I just hope we don’t get this emotional investment paired with financials. I don’t think we need to teget all antsy about keeping Dowdle when he’ll be 28 next year. I don’t mind just continuously taking a stab in the late rounds every year on one.  We should not be investing in one guy in particular when they’re not really a game breaker. See: Sanders, Hubbard, etc.  I’d say heck yes, take a shot at a guy high up if you’re convinced you’ve landed a Gibbs or Taylor level, but otherwise, don’t invest, don’t get emotional about a 3-4 game stretch. Reset and see what type of committee you can construct with fresh legs.   
×
×
  • Create New...