Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox: New Orleans next DC?

xtheronx

By xtheronx,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Pretty sure he'll take a Head coaching job before taking a demotion in New Orleans

He may not get the chance, at least not at the NFL level.

The remaining openings are in Oakland (not an option) Cleveland (looking for an offensive coach) and Denver. The Broncs are a possibility, but they're also interviewing Gregg Williams.

Fox and Sean Payton are good friends from way back, and it'd be a smart move for New Orleans since Fox knows the personnel here.

The choice Denver makes could be key.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
Posted

It's possible if Greg Williams is hired away, Sean Payton and John Fox have allot of history and Payton was praising Fox earlier in the season.

I would love to see this simply because it would add more to the rivalry and I'd love to see our offense light-up Fox's defense. Imagine all the clapping and gum chewing that would take place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Punisher Newbie

Punisher

Posted
Posted

It's possible if Greg Williams is hired away, Sean Payton and John Fox have allot of history and Payton was praising Fox earlier in the season.

I would love to see this simply because it would add more to the rivalry and I'd love to see our offense light-up Fox's defense. Imagine all the clapping and gum chewing that would take place?

That would be nice. But a more likely scenario would be Fox's defense beating the piss out of our O.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

You'd expect an early advantage to New Orleans because Fox would know our people well.

Within a year or so though, between roster turnover and changes in scheme, that advantage would be nullified.

You'd also have to factor in that we would know his tendencies. Naturally, he could change them, but "Fox" and "change" are two words that haven't gone together much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...