Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

KaseKlosed Killer4 Round Mock Draft (With Trades)


KaseKlosed
 Share

Recommended Posts

Fun write up. 

I like the idea of Golden for us but I’m just unsure if that’s where our FO’s head is at Round 1. Think he could be a great fit for our offense.

So this scenario assumes SF trades 43 and 11 for 8?

Ill be honest, not the biggest Kennard fan but otherwise good stuff.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Fun write up. 

I like the idea of Golden for us but I’m just unsure if that’s where our FO’s head is at Round 1. Think he could be a great fit for our offense.

So this scenario assumes SF trades 43 and 11 for 8?

Ill be honest, not the biggest Kennard fan but otherwise good stuff.

They didnt show the trade but it might have included 111

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather have the FS than Golden. Golden looks solid, like him more than Tet from what I have seen. Still not ending up with the best playable immediately talent on the D would be a hard fail in round 1. The D's free agency injection was a start but not close enough to where it needs to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

They didnt show the trade but it might have included 111

Yeah my guess too - so 8 and 111 for 11 and 43. 

 I also have a hard time seeing Grant lasting that long - T Sweat did, but dropped bc of character concerns. 

From a write up and prospect spotlight standpoint this is nice, but from a predictive side, not so sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Fun write up. 

I like the idea of Golden for us but I’m just unsure if that’s where our FO’s head is at Round 1. Think he could be a great fit for our offense.

So this scenario assumes SF trades 43 and 11 for 8?

Ill be honest, not the biggest Kennard fan but otherwise good stuff.

Trade was SF received 8 and 111 and Panthers received 11 and 43 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they drafted grant, Schwesinger, and Kennard in rounds 2-3, IDGAF about the rest of the draft. Those 3 should make this draft a clear winner and infuse talent on this soft-ass defense. 

 

Now to poop on the dream, 99.99999% each of them will be drafted before they were in this draft. Nice dream tho.. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...