Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I bet a CBA gets hammered out sooner than later now.


Highlandfire

Recommended Posts

these two decisions are likely to lend support to the owners.

now we'll see who really controls the players union: the few players who make a ton of money and don't want to lose any of it, or the players who either just want to play or need to play because they aren't in that top pay bracket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep and that BS collusion case is gonna get tossed as well. Smith better realize real damn quick the Goverment and the courts aren't going to help them.

I don't think the govt will either. However, it is worth noting, that they have in the past. The federal courts ruled for decertification in the 90s. Also, the recent case brought against the NFL by the jersey maker? opens up loophole (NFL=32 seperate corporations) for the union to take advantage of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the govt will either. However, it is worth noting, that they have in the past. The federal courts ruled for decertification in the 90s. Also, the recent case brought against the NFL by the jersey maker? opens up loophole (NFL=32 seperate corporations) for the union to take advantage of.

Doesn't that assume that there is a lockout? What if the owners give them their best offer and make the player's strike. They they couldn't decertify right? Every player would be making their own decision to strike if they dissolved the union. They would have to keep things intact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...