Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 NFL Draft - Day 3 Discussion

Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Bowman, Moore, Ransom, whichever safety they think fits and can start would be great.

But it's the time of the draft to grab a developmental defensive tackle, guard, center, or whomever they think has potential.

Bowman and Moore. Or Tez Johnson if he's available. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Overkill maybe? Taking the Gettleman approach to Edge rushers?

more bullets in the chamber, you can never have too many pass rushers and Kennard and/or Swinson can be eilite.  Conventional wisdom says one of the 2 guys from yesterday will work out so keep throwing darts.  That said I doubt they will be there

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
Just now, Krovvy said:

Someone pranked Shedeur pretending to be a GM yesterday. I'm actually starting to feel bad for him.

That's actually pretty fuged up.

Maybe this will be an incentive for the kid to get his head on straight and stop buying his own hype. But I doubt it. He's gotta close his inner circle up and get those guys pumping him up out of his ear.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

more bullets in the chamber, you can never have too many pass rushers and Kennard and/or Swinson can be eilite.  Conventional wisdom says one of the 2 guys from yesterday will work out so keep throwing darts.  That said I doubt they will be there

I'm surprised Kennard is still there. Honestly, if he's on the board at the next pick - make it happen. But... I do love me some Tez. I think he completes the receivers room. They wouldn't have to worry about that group again until contract time.

Edited by Navy_football
I do love Tez!
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swaggasaurus Proficient

Swaggasaurus

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Butterflyj30 said:

Should we take Sheadeur Sanders no one else wants him?

At this point. You can’t take Sanders unless you’re the Steelers, Chiefs, Ravens, or Bills. Team has to have No QB, Elite QB, or high on hallucinogens 40 year old QB. Anything else is self sabotage. And I actually like Sanders, hate watched him for 2 years. Something about being a Heisman finalist after running for your life and getting your ass whipped every drop back and still performing at a high level. Definitely should’ve been 2nd QB off the board,

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Week 6 PFF grades vs. DAL

      By TD alt · Posted

      I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • csx
      Mitchell Evans

      By csx · Posted

      Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
    • Basbear
      Can we get to 9-8?

      By Basbear · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...