Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So long for now, Moose 2.0

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PantherBoy95 Experienced

PantherBoy95

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Donald LaFell said:

Thankful for the “neat” factor if anything 

Yeah I couldn't get excited, and didn't even read the story when we signed him. It would've been very cool about 2 years ago. This year we're so deep at WR you know it would take a lot for him to stay on anything more than Practice Squad (which is still an amazing accomplishment in life I should say).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jay Roosevelt Grand Master

Jay Roosevelt

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Camp Fodder said:

I think it was more of us having to start our fifth string running back as to why we didn’t get to the superbowl

No chance we were going into Seattle that year in the NFC Championship and beating the Seahawks. Maybe if we had managed to get the #1 seed and hosted the game, but people tend to forget how good that Seahawks team was in 2005.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, Camp Fodder said:

I think it was more of us having to start our fifth string running back as to why we didn’t get to the superbowl

We had no real offensive threat outside of 89. Even with moose,  we had no rushing attack.  Seattle in Seattle that year.  Wouldn't have mattered anyways. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Car123 Mentor

Car123

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

We had no real offensive threat outside of 89. Even with moose,  we had no rushing attack.  Seattle in Seattle that year.  Wouldn't have mattered anyways. 

Foster was great that year. I remember him going off vs Atlanta in the last game of the season and vs the Giants in the wild card round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Clicheking
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By Clicheking · Posted

      Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • ProcessBlue2
      Mike Kaye predicting we trade up in 2nd round

      By ProcessBlue2 · Posted

      We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • woahfraze
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By woahfraze · Posted

      There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...