Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes got booed off the ice


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, lightsout said:

We will see tomorrow night if Rod and the team received the message. If we're heavily out shot again and not getting pucks on net, I can promise you this series is over. We're not in a spot to win 4 straight 

Perhaps there will be less pressure on the road? 

I don't know. But what we've seen so far is NOT canes hockey. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Perhaps there will be less pressure on the road? 

I don't know. But what we've seen so far is NOT canes hockey. 

If it wasn’t obvious already I think it’s pretty clear that we don’t match up well with Florida. They do what we do, only way better. And their coach isn’t an idiot who decides to experiment with his lines and call up minor league prospects deep into the postseason. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

If it wasn’t obvious already I think it’s pretty clear that we don’t match up well with Florida. They do what we do, only way better. And their coach isn’t an idiot who decides to experiment with his lines and call up minor league prospects deep into the postseason. 

Well he had to use a "call up" so to speak the issue we have is instead of using the consensus #1 defensive *prospect* a guy whose basically a generational type talent he chose to go with Scott Morrow again.... an AHL quality offense only RHD who was party to 4 goals allowed the game before.....

He also strangley chose to bench KK instead of Roslovic.... 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherChris said:

Well he had to use a "call up" so to speak the issue we have is instead of using the consensus #1 defensive *prospect* a guy whose basically a generational type talent he chose to go with Scott Morrow again.... an AHL quality offense only RHD who was party to 4 goals allowed the game before.....

He also strangley chose to bench KK instead of Roslovic.... 

 

That was purely a faceoff circle decision I think 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Yeah that worked sooooo well, yep lets lose a far better defender and size matchup for....  2 extra face offs.... and then proceed to lose 10% more face offs than game 1

I love rod but he getting out coached in every way possible. Also, Burns lead all defenders with 28 minutes of ice time?  Why not Slavin?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I love rod but he getting out coached in every way possible. Also, Burns lead all defenders with 28 minutes of ice time?  Why not Slavin?

Even though Morrow ended up with 10 minutes, he basically played 4 d most of the game Walker finished with nine minutes after leaving the game 2 minutes into the second.....

 

Morrow played 5 minutes in the last ten minutes of the third.....

 

WHY WOULD YOU PLAY A GUY ONLY TO BE SO SCARED YOU LEAVE HIM ON THE BENCH EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE DOWN A RIGHT HANDED DEFENSIVE SHOT.....

 

WE PLAYED 4 D BASICALLY HALF THE GAME 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I love rod but he getting out coached in every way possible. Also, Burns lead all defenders with 28 minutes of ice time?  Why not Slavin?

Ooooof It took me a second but I just realized why Burns played 28 minutes and its even more of an indictment of his horrid decision making.

BRET BURNS PLAYED 28 MINUTES LAST NIGHT 5 MORE THAN ANY OTHER D MAN.

WALKER LEFT 2 MINUTES INTO THE SECOND AND DID NOT RETURN ROD WITH FIVE HEALTHY DEFENSEMEN LEFT 3 LEFT HAND D AND 2 RIGHT HAND D CHOSE TO KEEP MORROW ON THE BENCH UNTIL WE WERE DOWN 5-0 OPTING TO PLAY 40 YEAR OLD BURNS FOR 28 MINUTES AND PLAYING WITH JUST 4 DEFENSEMEN!!!! BECAUSE 

 

BURNS PLAYED 28 MINUTES BECAUSE ROD WAS TOO SCARED TO PLAY THE GUY HE DRESSED OVER A POTENTIAL GAME CHANGER YOU CANT MAKE THIS poo UP.

Edited by PantherChris
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...