Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tuesday tweets and news


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

IDK. That an interesting one to think about. His track record has been to be more patient with GM's than HC's. That's generally why I think DC is more likely to end up on the hot seat first. 

Well, hopefully we just don't find out.

David Tepper once said something along the lines that the league was basically designed for teams largely all be 8-8.  If you are good for an extended period or bad.....it's the people running the show. 

the problem in Carolina is clear

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

David Tepper once said something along the lines that the league was basically designed for teams largely all be 8-8.  If you are good for an extended period or bad.....it's the people running the show. 

the problem in Carolina is clear

It's true. For all his faults, JR was a much better owner than Tepper in terms of cobbling together an averageish or successful team. 

We all thought Tepper would perhaps break the streak of all this average play mixed with good/great seasons. 

Mission Accomplished: We haven't seen either since.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2025 at 3:16 PM, kungfoodude said:

Honestly, my money is on him getting canned prior to the seasons in an effort for DC to save face. Not suggesting Evero won't deserve it but technically that wasn't a DC guy, he was inherited.

Yeah, that is a growing consensus and I concur. Hasn't shown much more than thin gimmicks(i.e. run scheme), obvious blitzes, and setting up dbs for blown coverages. I feel he could get canned even if we are winning. Maybe I want that scenario. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

Yeah, that is a growing consensus and I concur. Hasn't shown much more than thin gimmicks(i.e. run scheme), obvious blitzes, and setting up dbs for blown coverages. I feel he could get canned even if we are winning. Maybe I want that scenario. 🤣

I mean, if we get demonstrably better, I can see possibly staying the course. But even with a piss poor defensive roster, we need to dramatically improve for me to want to see more of the Evero Experience. 

There is only so much blaming the roster and injuries anyone is going to tolerate if we are consistently fielding bottom 5-10 units.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

There is only so much blaming the roster and injuries anyone is going to tolerate if we are consistently fielding bottom 5-10 units.

Exactly, even with injuries, I can't see too many more of those Jamar Chase 63 yard touchdowns and our DC keep his job. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

David Tepper once said something along the lines that the league was basically designed for teams largely all be 8-8.  If you are good for an extended period or bad.....it's the people running the show. 

the problem in Carolina is clear

Don't tell that to folks like Icege who continually go out of their way to shine his shoes.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean.....there is no question that is 100% on the players. That's fuging pathetic.

Exhibit A of why Woods was cut....

 

Trying to shoulder knockdown the best WR in the NFL ends up with air

 

Also not sure what the h*ll coverage Horn was playing but covering nothibg after a poo jam 

Screenshot_20250813_164813_X.jpg

Edited by PantherChris
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

There is only so much blaming the roster and injuries anyone is going to tolerate if we are consistently fielding bottom 5-10 units.

2023 PFF grades for Carolina's defense

  • Defense: 73.0 (15th)
  • Run Defense: 65.1 (13th)
  • Tackling: 32.0 (32nd)
  • Pressure: 71.5 (21st)
  • Coverage: 79.8 (12th)

2024 PFF grades for Carolina's defense

  • Defense: 44.7 (32nd)
  • Run Defense: 37.5 (32nd)
  • Tackling: 43.3 (21st)
  • Pressure: 51.9 (32nd)
  • Coverage: 50.1 (29th)

The 2024 defense was historically bad due to a lack of talent as a result of little-to-no resources being committed during the offseason, poor team building by prior regimes, and injuries to two of its most important players. However, the defense was serviceable 2023 - 2024 with pressure and tackling being the biggest issues (despite not having Jaycee for most of it).

I understand that folks are low on Evero because they desperately want a sacrifice for last season's results, but a step back from the ledge shows that it wasn't all terrible in his first season as DC for the team.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Icege said:

It's getting weird how much you love having me in your mouth.

Honestly I think you need to assess how healthy some of this is for you given how you have weaponized the poo reaction in less than a week. You seem pretty toxic. Best of luck with that bud.

Edited by frankw
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Icege said:

2023 PFF grades for Carolina's defense

  • Defense: 73.0 (15th)
  • Run Defense: 65.1 (13th)
  • Tackling: 32.0 (32nd)
  • Pressure: 71.5 (21st)
  • Coverage: 79.8 (12th)

2024 PFF grades for Carolina's defense

  • Defense: 44.7 (32nd)
  • Run Defense: 37.5 (32nd)
  • Tackling: 43.3 (21st)
  • Pressure: 51.9 (32nd)
  • Coverage: 50.1 (29th)

The 2024 defense was historically bad due to a lack of talent as a result of little-to-no resources being committed during the offseason, poor team building by prior regimes, and injuries to two of its most important players. However, the defense was serviceable 2023 - 2024 with pressure and tackling being the biggest issues (despite not having Jaycee for most of it).

I understand that folks are low on Evero because they desperately want a sacrifice for last season's results, but a step back from the ledge shows that it wasn't all terrible in his first season as DC for the team.

His defense in year one was a bit of a paper tiger in some respects but the talent drop off in year two was bananas. He has to recover significantly from last year to survive, IMO. And, TBH, it's not gonna be with tremendously more talent.

It's a tough spot. I do think he is as equally to blame as the FO.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...