Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer - SI Camp Notes (Short Video w/my own notes)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

Good stuff

  • Tetairoa McMillan looks like the real deal.  Legette seems faster.  Coker is cemented in.  With Thielen, Renfrow, Horn, George -- we could easily keep 7WR. (Not the first time someone on the outside of the org has mentioned Jacolby George)
  • The team views JT Sanders as a difference maker 
  • Rico & Etienne have looked good in the offense - provide great depth
  • No question marks on OL.  Rare to have in the league.  Even our first 2 main depth pieces after the starting 5 are returns.
  • Bryce is fully leading IN the system now - refining what he wants, working with Dave/Brad, and has the respect of the team.
  • Pat Jones & Wonnum should be relied on out of the gate, but Scourton could get a big role sooner than later.  Princely is likely to start as a DPR and develop over the course of the season.  That's our 4 man edge rotation.  
  • The team reportedly likes where we are at corner. CB1-Horn, CB2-Jackson, S-W, Corey Thornton* watch him
  • The team is also very high on Lathan Ransam.  Still advises Scott may get a role ahead of him to start the season, but could change fairly quickly.  

I really dont understand why we dont give Richardson more snaps at safety.  He has done solid every time, and always seems to be around the ball in the passing game.  I think he should definitely be the other starting safety right now. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

I really dont understand why we dont give Richardson more snaps at safety.  He has done solid every time, and always seems to be around the ball in the passing game.  I think he should definitely be the other starting safety right now. 

From what I read, I think from Everos interview recently, it is because Nick Scott knows the calls and can get guys adjusted presnap. Post snap, his play is marginal at best, but Evero wants a good communicator and I guess he believes none of the other guys can do it yet. I expect a change in starter at some point in the season though.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

From what I read, I think from Everos interview recently, it is because Nick Scott knows the calls and can get guys adjusted presnap. Post snap, his play is marginal at best, but Evero wants a good communicator and I guess he believes none of the other guys can do it yet. I expect a change in starter at some point in the season though.

On the one hand, I get it. On the other hand, you gotta find someone who can do that while also holding their own after the ball is snapped. Nick Scott may be smart and he may really help get others in the right place pre-snap but he instantly becomes a liability as soon as the ball is snapped and it's go time.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

From what I read, I think from Everos interview recently, it is because Nick Scott knows the calls and can get guys adjusted presnap. Post snap, his play is marginal at best, but Evero wants a good communicator and I guess he believes none of the other guys can do it yet. I expect a change in starter at some point in the season though.

I think Evero is way too committed to his guys in general. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

From what I read, I think from Everos interview recently, it is because Nick Scott knows the calls and can get guys adjusted presnap. Post snap, his play is marginal at best, but Evero wants a good communicator and I guess he believes none of the other guys can do it yet. I expect a change in starter at some point in the season though.

Both safeties need that in the Fangio-disciple system because of how they play off each other and how we disguise roles snap-to-snap.  Both safeties need to be able to take in the call and assignment as we're trying to disguise and interchange when someone drops, runs a delayed blitz, etc.  Make a QB think we're in cover 2 when it's 3 post-snap.  There's a lot that goes to it on a snap-to-snap basis so I think it's understandable with Scott (to a certain point). 

To me- This staff doesn't seem stubborn, I think they'll recognize when it is worth putting Ransam in.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, XClown1986 said:

I'm actually excited for this season. First season in years. I think we are going to make some noise. We may not make the playoffs, but I expect this team to be tough and fun.

Yeah agree. I'm looking forward to the season.  No real set win expectation but I just want these guys to get their sh*t together and beat some good teams.  Joke seasons are over, it's time for them to stop embarrassing themselves and Charlotte.  Time to prove we're not cellar dwellers anymore.  Who knows, maybe we do end up surprising.  We've seen quick turnarounds like WAS and HOU.  Maybe we can finally figure it out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully the rest of the league is as high on our fringe of the roster WRs as we seem to be and hopefully there's a team out there with a need at WR and a similar position with their LBs and we can work out a swap. I'm not saying we're getting a major impact player out of it but basically get a guy who was maybe going to snag a spot on a deep roster or at least essentially skip to the very front of the line on the waiver wire giving up a player that we may have end up having to cut anyway.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Both safeties need that in the Fangio-disciple system because of how they play off each other and how we disguise roles snap-to-snap.  Both safeties need to be able to take in the call and assignment as we're trying to disguise and interchange when someone drops, runs a delayed blitz, etc.  Make a QB think we're in cover 2 when it's 3 post-snap.  There's a lot that goes to it on a snap-to-snap basis so I think it's understandable with Scott (to a certain point). 

To me- This staff doesn't seem stubborn, I think they'll recognize when it is worth putting Ransam in.

I agree with this. Does everyone remember last year when someone would have a massive pass play against us 3-4 times each game? we had multiple busted coverages every Sunday. I’d rather have Scott get beat than have free runners with nobody around them. That being said, hopefully eventually it’s a more talented guy back there who also knows all the calls 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hopefully the rest of the league is as high on our fringe of the roster WRs as we seem to be and hopefully there's a team out there with a need at WR and a similar position with their LBs and we can work out a swap. I'm not saying we're getting a major impact player out of it but basically get a guy who was maybe going to snag a spot on a deep roster or at least essentially skip to the very front of the line on the waiver wire giving up a player that we may have end up having to cut anyway.

Yeah at LB, I like Wallace's potential (big year for him), but if he still has some growing pains, we absolutely cannot have crap next to him. 

From what I gather, the Rams didn't hate Rozeboom, but once some talent went down and he didn't have better talent assisting, he was pretty badly exposed.  He's an alright LB for depth, but not a starting quality LB.  You gotta see what Wallace can do year 2, but on Rozeboom's side, I think we really need to look at cut season or maybe a trade.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Yeah at LB, I like Wallace's potential (big year for him), but if he still has some growing pains, we absolutely cannot have crap next to him. 

From what I gather, the Rams didn't hate Rozeboom, but once some talent went down and he didn't have better talent assisting, he was pretty badly exposed.  He's an alright LB for depth, but not a starting quality LB.  You gotta see what Wallace can do year 2, but on Rozeboom's side, I think we really need to look at cut season or maybe a trade.  

Yeah, Rozeboom is alright if he's your worst LB out there but if you're counting on him being the best... oh wee mayne 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...