Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 1 - Panthers @ Jaguars (practice tweets, news articles, videos, etc)


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, bandu said:

LOL I am not making anything up ? I never said the Jags had a great offense last season ?

I said Liam Coen had a good offense in Tampa Bay last season 

& yes the Jags struggled to score points last season & that's why they hired Liam Coen & moved up in the draft to draft Travis Hunter & then you failed to mention the Jags starting Qb Trevor Lawerence missed 7 games last season &  

just saying 

They actually averaged a point less with Laurence just fyi. 

An unproven coach and a CB who moonlights as a WR are groundbreaking... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

 the Bucs have been strong on 3rd down the last 2 seasons.   So, signs point that it might not be exclusively tied to either of the coaches....and more to do to with the constant (the players/Baker).  But overall, the Bucs offense was better under Cohen than Canales. 

Trevor was hurt last year, Etienne was hurt last.  Trevor been banged up the last 2 years.   I don't think the Jags O is "good" but it has the potential to be a lot more explosive than ours IMO.    Trevor got that dumb/aggressive tendency to his play style (double edged sword). 

41% is a LOT less than 53%  that blanket statment is borderline gaslighting 12% more third downs coverted?  Lol Trevor is injury prone and turnover prone i cant imagine hating my team so much that I feel the need to pump the Jags 🤣🤣🤣

Edited by PantherChris
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

They actually averaged a point less with Laurence just fyi. 

An unproven coach and a CB who moonlights as a WR are groundbreaking... 

ok well if you want to talk #'s from last season i  can tell you without even looking that Trevor Lawerence missed 7 games in 2024 & while on the other hand  Bryce young played in 14 games all 4 quarters & they still  both had almost the same amount of  passing yards in 24 ' .they were both in the lower to below mid 2,000 yards in 24'

well Trevor Lawerence actually missed  7 1/2 games in 24'

& yes the #2 overall pick in the draft should be considered groundbreaking slash game changer & I did nor even discuss all the other injuries on offense  such as their  2 time pro bowl TE Evan Engram etc .

my point being the Jags week 1  2025 is a much improved team offensively than the Jags were in 2024...just saying 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

41% is a LOT less than 53%  that blanket statment is borderline gaslighting 12% more third downs coverted?  Lol Trevor is injury prone and turnover prone i cant imagine hating my team so much that I feel the need to pump the Jags 🤣🤣🤣

vs the rest of the league, the Bucs have been good on 3rd down the past 2 seasons.  It's a relevant fact given the talk was about 3rd down play. 

I'm not pumping up the Jags.  If you are going to talk about what any team did last year and using that to allude what to expect week 1....the details become relevant.  A completely healthy team paired w/ Cohen, I think most out there are assuming more firepower to their O than the 2024 stat you referenced suggests.    

I can't imagine being so sensitive about the Panthers... where you basically can't talk football if our bad team is also going to be mentioned.   

I think most out their project in the land of bad football teams, we are the slightly worse bad team.   Acknowledging football realties isn't hyping or hating.   Jags got a better D on paper.  Jags got a paper O on paper.  Not a huge gap but edge goes to them. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

vs the rest of the league, the Bucs have been good on 3rd down the past 2 seasons.  It's a relevant fact given the talk was about 3rd down play. 

I'm not pumping up the Jags.  If you are going to talk about what any team did last year and using that to allude what to expect week 1....the details become relevant.  A completely healthy team paired w/ Cohen, I think most out there are assuming more firepower to their O than the 2024 stat you referenced suggests.    

I can't imagine being so sensitive about the Panthers... where you basically can't talk football if our bad team is also going to be mentioned.   

I think most out their project in the land of bad football teams, we are the slightly worse bad team.   Acknowledging football realties isn't hyping or hating.   Jags got a better D on paper.  Jags got a paper O on paper.  Not a huge gap but edge goes to them. 

 

So much conjuncture in this statement, and LMFAO at assuming.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Damn.    

Hunt came back for drills after tweaking his foot, but they pulled him out of precaution.

I dont think there's any real concern about Lewis & Hunt for Sunday.

I think it's a long shot for Icky to play though.

I really hope we are getting some of these random injuries out early and we will have health luck throughout the season.

Regardless, I'm glad we have depth, although I'm not pumped to see Yosh Nijman out there.

I've yet to see anything in his play that has warranted the investment by the team, but Sunday is his biggest chance yet to prove his value.

We'll see

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Castavar said:

I'm more worried about conditioning than anything. This team seems to always have the worst conditioning in the league in terms of players being ready for the season and injuries. It supposed to be in the 90s in that humid Florida heat and I foresee our players gassing out before the 4th quarter where we will eventually lose the game, basically any other opening game for the Panthers. 

Wow. I literally just called this 3 hours ago and lo and behold, we have 3 starting o-line on injury report. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...