Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Between Canales and Morgan, who do you keep and trust moving forward


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ProcessBlue2 said:

Morgan doesn’t seem as bad because he’s following one of the worst GMs ever.

I think it’s still too early to tell on both, it’s just been 1 season. I do like that Dan fixed the OL but I don’t like the decision to keep Evero or the lack of attention to some of the position groups.

I’d like to see what this team can do with just average QB play. I think it would elevate everyone. 

Its not really a secret sauce when you simply pay to have the most expensive line in football.  It leads to neglect in other areas.  IE defense

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason, over the years since 18/19, there seems to be an association that if you play for Carolina, you collect your check, half ass it, get pats on the back and positive press from the F.O., and then you either fade into obscurity because you're a jag, or you leave and prosper under a system with better leadership, one that is holding players accountable and getting much more out of the player who coasted at Carolina.

Whatever option eliminates this stench, this "culture", whatever the hell it is, sign me up for that.  My thinking is, unfortunately, as long as Tepper is here, the leadership layers beneath him will be the cucks of the NFL.  But if he truly steps back, then you have to can Morgan definitely with the possibility of trashing Canales too, if he (Canales) being here clouds the next GM hire.  But seriously, what great football mind(s) and talent evaluator/developer combo wants to come here?  We're stuck with scraping the bottom of the barrel when hiring season rolls around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nussmeier shows all the qualities, but has a really bad game here and there. Sellers is raw, we will see how things play out.
    • Wait......CRA is now playing UP our receivers?  
    • Well let's be realistic here. He could have taken one look at Bryce Young on tape and known what he was getting. As JackieLee stated his work with QB's like Geno Smith and Baker Mayfield is a big contributing factor in why he was hired. At the same time we also have to recognize other factors. Seemingly and realistically he was the only one seriously considering the job. And as far as "fixing" Bryce Young goes one entire staff has already gotten the axe over him. Frank Reich was vilified as possibly the worst head coaching hire ever. 2 years later the more we see of Bryce the more it looks like he was the problem. Right now we are at a true crossroads. We cannot just play out the season with Young and be a serious franchise. We have to try and see what we have in the young roster and firmly get some sort of look at Canales offense. At this point Dave Canales needs to earn the right to draft his own QB. So far he has developed bupkis at the most important position. And he and Dan Morgan made the decision to not give Bryce Young one iota of competition for the third year in a row. He cannot claim the cupboards are bare beyond his control.
×
×
  • Create New...