Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A lookback at Morgan's first draft


R0CKnR0LLA
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Those first three picks are looking ROUGH. Sanders and Smith-Wade have a chance to prove to be decent mid-rounders 

CSW might be the best pick of the group, and I see his ceiling as solid.  I’d say Munnerlyn is a good comp, but Munnerlyn actually was very good in his role.

The more I see of Sanders, the more he feels like the new Ian Thomas.  But can’t make a definitive assessment on that until he plays with a good QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

1.32 — WR Xavier Legette

2.46 — RB Jonathon Brooks

3.72 — LB Trevin Wallace

4.101 — TE Ja'Tavion Sanders

5.157 — CB Chau Smith-Wade

6.200 — DT Jaden Crumedy

7.240 — LB Michael Barrett

 

 

lol

spacer.png

Ouch!!!

What makes it worse is I think every other suggestion the huddle made would have been good picks lol
Round 1: 

Round 2:

Round 3:

Re-reading this, most of the huddle hated that draft from the get go too

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

1.32 — WR Xavier Legette

2.46 — RB Jonathon Brooks

3.72 — LB Trevin Wallace

4.101 — TE Ja'Tavion Sanders

5.157 — CB Chau Smith-Wade

6.200 — DT Jaden Crumedy

7.240 — LB Michael Barrett

 

 

lol

Smith-Wade was the only one I liked for the value.  I gave up getting pissed off during the draft. It's not worth it any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Director of scouting has been with the team since 2021

Director of pro scouting since 2020 

Both have been promoted heavily from lower positions since then. 

Assistant director is from the Commanders. "Was with them for 15 years"

Bunch of lower level area scouts have been with the team for 2+ years at least or since before Morgan was promoted. 

So the team is basically using the same staff that Scott Fitterer used. 

And that right there is exactly why we are where we are. Seems to me that Tepper is too lazy to clean all of them out or he is too comfortable with them

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

And that right there is exactly why we are where we are. Seems to me that Tepper is too lazy to clean all of them out or he is too comfortable with them

There's aren't many NFL level scouts and most are just cycled from team to team and have really long careers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

Shrugs, our opinions are all AFTER the fact they don't change anything bub.

As a fan you deal with what your dealt, maybe if you figure that out at some point you will wig out less.

When you say poo like this for people criticizing the brooks pick then its tee ball season.   

The idiots are out in full force 

 

Simply admit Brooks was a poo pick and he most certainly didnt get 1500 yards last year 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

When you say poo like this for people criticizing the brooks pick then its tee ball season.   

The idiots are out in full force 

 

Simply admit Brooks was a poo pick and he most certainly didnt get 1500 yards last year 🤣

I never said I wasn't one of them 😉

And people who b*tch non stop about things they have NO CONTROL over are idiots.

I wanted Frazier.

Brooks has been a horrible pick can't get much worse than only three game appearances, but sure captain obvious :÷)  also deff hard to get any yards when you dont play lol,  wait what did my opinion change Brooks is no longer the pick? Ooof 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...