Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Tepper going to clean the house again after this season?


Lame Duck
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Lame Duck said:

You could put Madden as coach with prime Tom Brady into this team, we will win 3-5 games.  It’s the culture… it’s toxic.  After 8 years, some folks still did not figure it out.

The official story is that Tepper is no longer so hands-on as he used to be.

If this is true, it's a start.

It's not a guarantee of improvement though. There are still a lot of things that would have to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The official story is that Tepper is no longer so hands-on as he used to be.

If this is true, it's a start.

It's not a guarantee of improvement though. There are still a lot of things that would have to change.

No hands on?  Didn’t he just chewed Canales out after the game?  I’d say that’s pretty hands on.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jmac said:

If you can call being read the riot act constructive......

I once worked for a company that believed anyone who was competent in one area would automatically be competent in another (i.e. the Jerry Richardson philosophy). Management had absolutely zero understanding of what a skill set was.

As a result, what you got was people telling you that your performance wasn't good enough. But when you asked them how to make it better, they had no clue.

"Be better!"

"How?"

"I don't know! Just do it or else you're fired!"

Even though Richardson is long gone, I suspect there's still a lot of that kind of thing in the Panthers team culture.

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lame Duck said:

No hands on?  Didn’t he just chewed Canales out after the game?  I’d say that’s pretty hands on.

We only know that they talked. The character and tone of the conversation is unknown.

My own take is that I believe him when he says he isn't meddling anymore. Unfortunately, the idea that this alone actually solves anything is fallacious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

To be fair SS was always a psycho with a giant ego. Haven't heard anything near that with Tillis. 

Some folks would tell you it's okay to have someone psycho on your team as long as they're good at what they do. 

My response is typically to apply that concept to a marriage and see if you still think it's a good idea 😳

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We only know that they talked. The character and tone of the conversation is unknown.

My own take is that I believe him when he says he isn't meddling anymore. Unfortunately, the idea that this alone actually solves anything is fallacious.

I’m not…. Dan Morgan is a GM last time I checked, not Tepper.  Manager should be talking to his employees, not managers manager.  When big boss talks to you, overstepping your manager, that’s either means your big boss don’t trust your manager or he’s meddling and sticks his nose into everything.  You pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Some folks would tell you it's okay to have someone psycho on your team as long as they're good at what they do. 

My response is typically to apply that concept to a marriage and see if you still think it's a good idea 😳

Under Tepper they need to be well adjusted and not sycophants or the worst comes out. Wasn't that the year the staff went knives out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I think Canales is safe no matter what. If he gets to select his own QB and he sucks next season that may be all she wrote. 
Evero should have been fired last season. I think Tepper has given Canales a long rope. 

He has chosen 3 and has no option behind Young this year. His coaching alone is enough to justify a firing if it keeps going the way it's going again. No need for a year 3 where he gets fired mid way for being who he was in year 1 and 2. That's like saying Evero deserved a year 3 after last year. It makes no sense logic wise. Plus he chose Young when he signed up for this while others walked. 

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Their use of the phrase questionable QB situation fits perfectly. He is stuck, for the moment at least, in a situation with Bryce that he can't really get out of. There have been improvements for Young, but he hasn't been a world changer. He had horrible coaching first year and was saddled with a broken down remnant of what had been an afterthought team anyway. There's one year left to keep him on the cheap with the idea that if he cranks out a great season, we've got first dibs on him for the next. If he tanks out, then off to free agency Young goes to either a QB whisperer-type situation or becomes a fairly battle tested back up QB. And we get something to add into our compensatory picks formulation. This is a make or break year for Young, but not for Morgan or Canales. 
    • If they lose the ECF in wimpy fashion, like anything less than a Game 7, its time to can Rod. 
    • Do you people really give no credence to the fact that Carolina’s went almost two weeks between games while Montreal played an intense seven game series that just ended Monday? That break was too much to be ready to go, and it showed.   The Canes pressed in the first, likely from overzealousness to prove the layoff wasn’t too much. once the Canes settled into their game without pressing, the game was much tighter. Every year, posts in the Panthers forum question how little the starters play in the preseason? Why is that? Because we all know not going at game speed against an opponent can lead to a slow start when the games turn real. Even with prior ECF disappointments, I’m going to hope last night was more akin to starters not playing in the preseason. 
×
×
  • Create New...