Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Tepper going to clean the house again after this season?


Lame Duck
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, Lame Duck said:

I’m not…. Dan Morgan is a GM last time I checked, not Tepper.  Manager should be talking to his employees, not managers manager.  When big boss talks to you, overstepping your manager, that’s either means your big boss don’t trust your manager or he’s meddling and sticks his nose into everything.  You pick.

Story was that Morgan was the only one in the prior setup who was willing to tell Tepper he was wrong rather than just rolling over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, hepcat said:

It doesn't matter that he's more hands off with the football decisions anymore. He spent the better part of 8 years breeding a toxic losing culture and he is still overseeing the management of the team. The leadership from the top down is broken, and until that is fixed nothing will change. 

Discussed elsewhere...

Just taking his hands off doesn't mean a miraculous recovery is on the horizon. Still have to do the work, and in this case the work is an extremely hard thing to do in even the best of circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't read the thread, and I'm sure someone has probably made this point; but in case they haven't. If past history is any indicator, then no. He's never cleaned house. He's dusted off a room here and there, but he always retains part of the old regime, so our FO, coaching, and roster are never on the same page. Without burning it all down simultaneously, the only was this works is if he hires a reputable consultant that recommends a president of football ops, who evaluates Dan, and if he gets rid of Dan, hire a competent GM (I'd prefer one with a scouting background who is known to be draft guru) and then that GM evaluates Canales, and builds a roster that suits DCs or new coach's plan.

Edited by Khaki Lackey
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Discussed elsewhere...

Just taking his hands off doesn't mean a miraculous recovery is on the horizon. Still have to do the work, and in this case the work is an extremely hard thing to do in even the best of circumstances.

David Tepper can't change who he is. What made him successful in finance is working against him as a football team owner. The atrocious product on the field should equate to bankruptcy but because of NFL revenue sharing and the alternative use of the stadium, he isn't financially impacted by the team being dogshit. So aside from his toxic leadership, there is no monetary gain for him to build a winner anymore. Panthers fans are truly f*cked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/9/2025 at 9:56 AM, TLGPanthersFan said:

I think Canales is safe no matter what. If he gets to select his own QB and he sucks next season that may be all she wrote. 
Evero should have been fired last season. I think Tepper has given Canales a long rope. 

Yea...he gets his QB and sucks again then we're in the same position with a new coach and the cycle continues. I'm prolly the only one that likes Canales offense...just execute it.

Heard a stat the D has given up 7 consecutive 200yd rushing games....and what does Evero  do, started the season with a 200yd rushing game with a pretty improved D over last year... That is pretty much  telling us he absolutely needs to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this team has 2 coordinators running the team and no real HC. Canales is the OC and title of HC while Evero is the DC. Our defense has been ass for a long time and Evero has overseen this collapse, to give up 200 rushing yds again after all of these D-line upgrades says that Canales is not overseeing Evero's game planning. I've never seen Canales talk in great detail about the defensive side of the ball in his press conferences. Trevor Lawrence even said that he felt prepared for Carolina's defense. I can see that there's no real trust or respect between Canales and Evero. 

I'm also tired of Canales "always positive attitude." These are grown ass men, they don't need coddling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

I think this team has 2 coordinators running the team and no real HC. Canales is the OC and title of HC while Evero is the DC. Our defense has been ass for a long time and Evero has overseen this collapse, to give up 200 rushing yds again after all of these D-line upgrades says that Canales is not overseeing Evero's game planning. I've never seen Canales talk in great detail about the defensive side of the ball in his press conferences. Trevor Lawrence even said that he felt prepared for Carolina's defense. I can see that there's no real trust or respect between Canales and Evero. 

I'm also tired of Canales "always positive attitude." These are grown ass men, they don't need coddling. 

I still want to know how these guys survived the Frank era.   Dom can't even look in the mirror at this point and notice things that need fixing.  

Dom Capers Archives - The Comeback: Today's Top Sports Stories & Reactions

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...