Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Al Wallace speaks the truth


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, frankw said:

Unfortunately Bryce Young won't be able to play opposite a QB gifting us points every week.

We've got a tough stretch of games coming up. Some of you hardline Bryce guys might want to pace yourselves.

Any of the next 4 (Patriots, Dolphins, Cowboys, Jets) are winnable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, that’s a cool clip!

maybe check out Jake Delhomme, who also is on Panthers payroll (and happened to play the same position as Bryce at a highly competitive level) and see what he had to say about yesterday’s game on the post-game radio show.  He literally said “not trying to be a debbie downer” but, said that Bryce and the offense left a ton of plays out there on the field and a lot to be desired.  He focused on the same shortcomings that most objective observers (of our QB position) have been stating ad nauseam.  He wasn’t overly celebratory or doing any of the glazing that Al and most of the paid endorsers are doing.  Most would feel Jake’s tone and message was quite negative, but in reality, it’s just the truth.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Hey, that’s a cool clip!

maybe check out Jake Delhomme, who also is on Panthers payroll (and happened to play the same position as Bryce at a highly competitive level) and see what he had to say about yesterday’s game on the post-game radio show.  He literally said “not trying to be a debbie downer” but, said that Bryce and the offense left a ton of plays out there on the field and a lot to be desired.  He focused on the same shortcomings that most objective observers (of our QB position) have been stating ad nauseam.  He wasn’t overly celebratory or doing any of the glazing that Al and most of the paid endorsers are doing.  Most would feel Jake’s tone and message was quite negative, but in reality, it’s just the truth.

I'm looking for the video but I found this from SI (from 3 days ago) in the meantime.

"If you remove the turnovers, which is a pointless exercise since they happened, Bryce Young has been quietly very good. Sometimes, you can live with the turnovers, but the explosive plays to offset them haven't been there, and the turnovers have directly led to points and losses.

But Jake Delhomme thinks that's the one area that needs to be cleaned up. Otherwise, Young has been strong. "We saw Bryce end the year well. I saw him play decent the first few weeks (this season). It’s just the turnovers, that’s something that’s killed him," he said via The Athletic's Joe Person."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cranky said:

I'm looking for the video but I found this from SI (from 3 days ago) in the meantime.

"If you remove the turnovers, which is a pointless exercise since they happened, Bryce Young has been quietly very good. Sometimes, you can live with the turnovers, but the explosive plays to offset them haven't been there, and the turnovers have directly led to points and losses.

But Jake Delhomme thinks that's the one area that needs to be cleaned up. Otherwise, Young has been strong. "We saw Bryce end the year well. I saw him play decent the first few weeks (this season). It’s just the turnovers, that’s something that’s killed him," he said via The Athletic's Joe Person."

Can we please stop quoting shills for the organisation?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, frankw said:

Unfortunately Bryce Young won't be able to play opposite a QB gifting us points every week.

We've got a tough stretch of games coming up. Some of you hardline Bryce guys might want to pace yourselves.

Are you can root for your team Grinch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did he say that was wrong? Bryce keeps rebounding and bouncing back? He is developing chemistry with wide receivers? He handles adversity? He was a good leader even when he was benched?

All those things are widely known and acknowledged by players and the media. Did Al say he was great or a top quarterback? Did he say our offense was good? Let's see how this plays out. I am all for bringing in competition at QB and said so this year before the draft. But I am gonna root for Bryce as long as he us here.

Done for now going to go shoot some black powder rifles at the range today.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love it.

Prodiddy says we should check out what a former professional QB, Jake Delhomme, says about Bryce.  He points out areas where the offense and Bryce need to be better.  Completely agree.

Then Cranky posts quotes from Jake that balances out the criticism with the positive things Bryce is doing.

The very next post OldhamA asks why are we even listening to former professional QB's talk about Bryce since he works for the team.

See, Jake even says he sucks.
Here's the whole quote.
Nevermind, don't listen to Jake.

I know it's not that big a deal.  I just find it funny what and how people use quotes or clips to support their arguments and how easy things can be taken out of context until you read or watch the entire thing.  No disrespect meant to either guy.

Edited by Loyalty4Life
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Love it.

Prodiddy says we should check out what a former professional QB, Jake Delhomme, says about Bryce.  He points out areas where the offense and Bryce need to be better.  Completely agree.

Then Cranky posts quotes from Jake that balances out the criticism with the positive things Bryce is doing.

The very next post OldhamA asks why are we even listening to former professional QB's talk about Bryce since he works for the team.

I know it's not that big a deal.  I just find it funny what and how people use quotes or clips to support their arguments and how easy things can be taken out of context until you read or watch the entire thing.  No disrespect meant to either guy.

Mostly because once a huddler establishes a position and someone disagrees, it become a contest to win the argument and a reputation to save. Justifying their position  becomes more important than the Panthers or the players since their ego and position on this message board is being challenged. That is why few people actually have an open mind or are willing to change their opinion.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Comparing a random stat to another rookie QB has nothing to do with the current subject.  Tom Brady had a 6.0 YPA his rookie year.  I hope you're not using one stat to define success of a QB? It's not a problem to want him to do better based on where he was drafted although I still contend it doesn't matter after the fact.  It doesn't matter if we're talking about Cam Newton, Tom Brady, Russel Wilson or any other QB.  It makes little difference once you're in the NFL.  Nobody gets a ring for where they were drafted.   Higher draft picks will get a little more time in most cases as teams want to make sure they've exhausted all avenues before they admit a draft pick can't play.  Other teams might pick them up thinking it wasn't the player but the organization and/or other coaches that caused the player not to succeed.  It's people's expectations that are wrong.  If we could go back and redo all the draft and put guys in the correct draft spot based on how well they played in the NFL, that would be nice.  Then your argument would make some sense.  People assume that where a player was drafted is a statement on how good that player is when the reality is there is a lot more luck than skill in drafting. If Coker turns into a pro bowl receiver and XL becomes a bust nobody cares except fans and the media. What we really should say is it's not too much to expect a player who has started at QB for a team over the last 2 years to be better than he currently shows.   Don't compare 1st round picks.  Compare starting QB's in the NFL.
    • They’re gonna have to go up against a real offense before any kind of judgement can be made of them.  Tlaw looks like damaged goods, Kyler is completely washed, and Penix….well…. they look better compared to last season but that’s what you’d expect with a healthy brown and horn.  I haven’t seen anything that indicates they’ll be considered an overall good defense when the dust has settled. 2002 it is not. 
×
×
  • Create New...