Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers’ Offensive Spending Is Misleading — and Bryce Young Is Paying the Price


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

Huh??? Pretty sure we have..

A.) Invested in the Oline... 

B.)We have two 1k running backs on the roster...along with a 2nd rounder waiting in the wings to get off IR. 

C.) Drafted WR (2 1st rounders)..the two that either he or his father asked for in consecutive years. 

We might not have an all pro squad to support him but we definitely invested in the offense. 

Side note: Before we pass judgement on the O, we might wanna wait on Coker to be activated. I wouldn't be shocked if we look totally different with him back in the lineup. 

Edited by ColumbusCounty
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

For some people there is no limit to the amount of resources we should invest to prop up the guy who is the 4th highest paid player on the roster while still on his rookie contract.

Also as I noted in another thread our passing YPG is the best it's been since 2020 and that's with Thielen who has been hyped immensely out of the picture.

it still amazes me how much blind loyalty people have for byoung.  delhome and newton didnt get this much loyalty and they actually took the team to the superbowl.  young has sucked since day 1 and showed almost no growth in 3 years and people still blame every coach and player on the team for holding his greatness back.  i dont know how anyone can watch a game and not see his limitations.  

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

We went out and bought the most expensive OL in the NFL for him

We paid 2 1k rushers in the backfield

sure, we didn’t go out in FA to once again give him basically the complete perfect cast in FA a 3rd freaking time.   We got a team to build and literally every resource can’t be devoted to Bryce.

But most of our best draft collateral has been devoted to Bryce.  

the entire argument of drafting him is that we wouldn’t be doing what we are doing. 

the spending isn’t misleading.  The investment needed around him has been off the charts overall and he still is Clausen-ish.  
 

 

Yes their best draft collateral was spent to support Bryce but that does not change the fact that they made poor choices. Drafting Mingo and Legette and were poor draft choices - ones that crippled the offensive play and did anything but help Young develope. Legette could still turn it around but to this point, he has not been productive.

The spending is misleading if you use it to gauge the support given to Young. It doesn't matter what dollar amount you use on the offense if none of it actually goes toward given Young someone to throw a pass to. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

The draft investment is even more critical than FAs, so it's misleading to, well say 'its misleading because they didn't work out' and the positional salary allocation matters.  You invest highly in a draft with the expectation/timeline of a second contract in the near future.  So it directly relates to positional allocation.  Unless you're stuck with an imbecile GM.    

Skill Positions:

2025: R1 WR, R4 RB, R5 TE, R6 WR

2024: R1 WR, R2 RB, R4 TE

2023: R2 WR

Since picking him at 1, we've drafted 4 wideouts, 2 RBs, 2 TEs.  Also factor in bringing in Coker (UDFA), Dowdle, & Thielen.  Not to mention trying Diontae.  We've done plenty. 

Also factor in that FAs kinda-maybe of have a say where they want to go.  

You can play the game with wishing we drafted someone else, but you can't say the framework wasn't sound. It was, we've just done poorly in choosing the talent to bring together. 

 

"You can play the game with wishing we drafted someone else, but you can't say the framework wasn't sound. It was, we've just done poorly in choosing the talent to bring together. "

Exactly - except I am not saying I wished they drafted someone else. I'm also not saying they have not tried. As you say, the framework was sound and I agree with what they were trying to do. If Theilen had stayed and Coker had not gone to IR, this year would have looked much different. Especially given how good Tet has looked. I would venture to guess all talk about how bad Young is would never have happened. But Theilen is gone, Coker is on IR still and all the offensive struggles are being blamed on Young which is absurd. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, cranky said:

"You can play the game with wishing we drafted someone else, but you can't say the framework wasn't sound. It was, we've just done poorly in choosing the talent to bring together. "

Exactly - except I am not saying I wished they drafted someone else. I'm also not saying they have not tried. As you say, the framework was sound and I agree with what they were trying to do. If Theilen had stayed and Coker had not gone to IR, this year would have looked much different. Especially given how good Tet has looked. I would venture to guess all talk about how bad Young is would never have happened. But Theilen is gone, Coker is on IR still and all the offensive struggles are being blamed on Young which is absurd. 

 

Forgive me, what are trying to say then? In like one sentence. Not asking this snarkily, genuinely don’t understand the take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Forgive me, what are trying to say then? In like one sentence. Not asking this snarkily, genuinely don’t understand the take.

 

As I pointed out in the OP, the Panthers are spending the least amount of their cap money on receivers and tight ends of any team in the NFL and have been the entire time Young has been here. It is true they spend heavily on the offense, it's just not directed towards the receivers or tight ends. So when people say Young should be doing better given all the support the Panthers' have given ($$$), I say those numbers are misguided as they aren't really going to anyone Young can pass to. You can't argue Young has all this support when his receivers on Sundays are a rookie, an undrafted rookie, a reclemation project, someone pulled from a practice squad and Legette. And his TE's are Tremble, another rookie and another practice squad guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cranky said:

 

As I pointed out in the OP, the Panthers are spending the least amount of their cap money on receivers and tight ends of any team in the NFL and have been the entire time Young has been here. It is true they spend heavily on the offense, it's just not directed towards the receivers or tight ends. So when people say Young should be doing better given all the support the Panthers' have given ($$$), I say those numbers are misguided as they aren't really going to anyone Young can pass to. You can't argue Young has all this support when his receivers on Sundays are a rookie, an undrafted rookie, a reclemation project, someone pulled from a practice squad and Legette. And his TE's are Tremble, another rookie and another practice squad guy. 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Forgive me, what are trying to say then? In like one sentence. Not asking this snarkily, genuinely don’t understand the take.

Let me try this. Here is a graph of what every team is spending on their receivers and tight ends. As you can see, the Panthers are dead last. Given that, I think its misleading to say he has all this support. After all, a qb's main job is to pass the ball. The Panthers spend the least amount on giving him someone to pass the ball to.

 

Screenshot 2025-10-03 at 10.41.45 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChibCU said:

We will never go anywhere unless we build our team through consistently stellar drafts. 

I don't know that it has to be stellar but you can't keep missing on one group which they have been doing with receivers. I do think they did well this year however. Time will tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

And if we weren't spending the most amount of money in the entire league on the OL you would be complaining about them not doing enough to protect him.

You are beyond helping.

And if we weren't spending the most amount of money in the entire league on the OL and Young was getting killed every week, you would still be blaming everything on his diminutive size and lack of arm strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...