Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers’ Offensive Spending Is Misleading — and Bryce Young Is Paying the Price


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

The second leading receiver for the panthers is literally a running back. Like right now in 2025. 

Well it used to be a TE, or was he the leading receiver. 

As long as we get the production from somewhere (such as it is); this QB will use the hell out of a RB if the RB can be used. 

As a secondary comment, I always though that was really what the Brooks pick was about. He was supposed to be ready for camp IIRC. 
 

Not endorsing the decision, just diagnosing it btw. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Khaki Lackey said:

Yeah, but he had a reliable WR in Thielan his first two years, and T-Mac this year. Not a stellar group, but he was billed as "a point guard that distributes the ball well." He hasn't been. Even our dipshit owner said having Bryce would save us from having to spend resources on WR. If you've got a good QB and good OL, you usually can get by with a mediocre WR corps, but we have Turnover Fred.

Thielen wouldn't have been higher than WR 3 on any other team but the Panthers though. Look what he's done with the Vikings so far. Every starting WR that was traded/released/ not resigned hasnt done anything for another team but they were Bryce's #1/#2 WRs during their time here.

Johnson, Mingo, Chark, Thielen, Marshall Jr.

Most of those guys were the WR1 during his first two years! That is a crazy terrible list. Throw in the fact that XL has looked more like a typical Panthers 2nd round dud than a true 1st round pick like DJ Moore or even Tmac and you can easily see that the Panthers have not done a good enough job with surrounding Bryce with NFL talent at the skill positions

That's not to say Bryce doesn't deserve his fair share of criticism. He absolutely does. He has a lot of terrible turnovers and makes some pretty bad throws/reads. I think he's limited in the short range, screen passes etc. And doesn't have good enough deep throw accuracy to keep defenses honest. We'll see what happens but if Bryce fails the Panthers front office definitely had a part to play

Edited by Mr Mojo Risin
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Exactly. I wouldn't call what he has been doing the last 3 years Succeeding. Lol

Al Wallace, as big as a panther homer as it gets calls his play "pedestrian" and he is not elevating his team.  They are winning because of him and thats a problem and if it doesnt get elevated then Dan and Dave have to make decision at the end of the year.

 

Nothing groundbreaking and its something we all know but hearing it from him is eye opening.  its on his last podcast

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could always be worse…

https://x.com/fos/status/1976294776346411312?s=46
 

The Browns are currently paying EIGHT QBs.

• Deshaun Watson, $35.9M
• Jameis Winston, $2.2M
• Dillon Gabriel, $1.1M
• Joe Flacco, $999K
• Shedeur Sanders, $955K
• Bailey Zappe, $315K
• Dorian Thompson-Robinson, $171K
• Kenny Pickett, $8K

(via @spotrac)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Could always be worse…

https://x.com/fos/status/1976294776346411312?s=46
 

The Browns are currently paying EIGHT QBs.

• Deshaun Watson, $35.9M
• Jameis Winston, $2.2M
• Dillon Gabriel, $1.1M
• Joe Flacco, $999K
• Shedeur Sanders, $955K
• Bailey Zappe, $315K
• Dorian Thompson-Robinson, $171K
• Kenny Pickett, $8K

(via @spotrac)

All of em are real shi*t too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Id sacrifice a small farm animal to have Jameis running this offense and dave refurbishing him.  It never was about the physical play it was all mental with him.  He doesnt give a poo and thinks he can make every throw.

It would be more fun for sure. Winston can make all the throws...and all the interceptions.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Ok salary aside, who would you take today over what we have?

Wow, you add our two qb rooms together and it's a collection of real gems. Id rather see anyone other than Young at this point, so give me crab legs.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...