Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

The question I wonder involves putting the cost behind us.     

At this point he's here, so does the premium paid even matter anymore? It set expectations no doubt, and they weren't met.  He's been bench-worthy bad, but he's come back and looked first average, above-average to maybe great, and then downright bad again.  Now we're back on a good trend again.  Absolute rollercoaster.  

So what level of performance deems him a viable option to hold?  He's looked absolutely incapable of moving an offense at times, and others like a guy you can "Purdy" with some dimes sprinkled in.    

So, if he continues on this 2 game trend and shows consistent average to above-average play, we're treading into tricky territory.  Such a big investment but he tops out as a top-15/20 QB option.  It's Alex Smith KC type vibes. Are we going to be sitting at 7-10 come end of season and feel kind of meh?

It's right at that fringe of what is worth it.  If he doesn't re-sh*t the bed, we may be best suited to go BPA next draft and see the 2026 progression.  And that will be the final make/break year. 

What I can see if he doesn't fall apart and things look manageable:

He may end up being the average precursor to finding the great talent that you can build the team around.  How Alex Smith was in KC.  They built that with him (not around him) until they eventually got Mahomes.  Heck, think back to Trent Green/Warner.  So, BY can manage, we may get some success, but if a stud comes along, we bail and roll with the new gun.  

 

I’m in agreement here.  I’m indifferent on the 5th year option.  I’m mostly getting ahead of myself and alluding to a monster extension.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

PJ Walker is the only QB in the Tepper era the Panthers managed to find wins with.  Only QB w/ a winning record.   

PJ had success in pro ball before the Panthers.  He he had NFL tools.    He just is inconsistent and unreliable.  PJ Walker is what you call a bad/poor man's gunslinger.  He can provide highs and lows both virtually guaranteed.  He is NFL depth. 

Bryce Young hasn't proven to improve a teams chances of winning better than the PJ Walker tier of QBing. PJ Walker can do things Bryce Young can't......and that's a problem 

 

 

Better than I could have said it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, fanpanther said:

It would be a complete panther type decision to give byoung a huge contract make him a top paid qb... in reality matt jones has shown more this year than byoung and he got basically nothing in freeagency.  byoung has done nothing to get paid a new contract at all.  

Daniel jones, not Matt. I think Matt is dead behind a liquor store somewhere. 

and under selling Daniel Jones. He’s playing like one of the four or five best qbs in the league.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Daniel jones, not Matt. I think Matt is dead behind a liquor store somewhere. 

and under selling Daniel Jones. He’s playing like one of the four or five best qbs in the league.  

Jones also had played well enough in his career to have been considered a starting caliber NFL QB without too mucb argument from most. His decline was significant but I personally attributed a lot of that to the "QB genuis" Brian Daboll and his neverending stream of underperforming QB's.

I don't think Jones ends up having an MVP caliber type season but he could easily have a Sam Darnold 2024-esque season on that offense.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Jones also had played well enough in his career to have been considered a starting caliber NFL QB without too mucb argument from most. His decline was significant but I personally attributed a lot of that to the "QB genuis" Brian Daboll and his neverending stream of underperforming QB's.

I don't think Jones ends up having an MVP caliber type season but he could easily have a Sam Darnold 2024-esque season on that offense.

Barring injury I think nfl mvp is already locked up this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Daniel jones, not Matt. I think Matt is dead behind a liquor store somewhere. 

and under selling Daniel Jones. He’s playing like one of the four or five best qbs in the league.  

Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, fanpanther said:

Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 

Always be wary of a QB in Shanahan's system. Not that they might not be good but that they will definitely look a lot better than they likely are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

The question I wonder involves putting the cost behind us.     

At this point he's here, so does the premium paid even matter anymore? It set expectations no doubt, and they weren't met.  He's been bench-worthy bad, but he's come back and looked first average, above-average to maybe great, and then downright bad again.  Now we're back on a good trend again.  Absolute rollercoaster.  

 

 

I don't think premium paid matters at this stage.  Think the rest of league has established that.  We have seen top 10 QBs moved on from after just 1 year.  We have seen massive trade's at at the top moved on from too.   Teams can't afford to waste time.  

I mean, it's not all just Bryce in a vacuum.  Biggest issue is the front office in this equation.  Maybe he would be less of an issue to move on from if they prioritized their QB roster and it would have already sort of taken care of itself.....if they added young QBs and real competition for the spot.   

we are sort of unique in how how competition-less our roster is given how iffy the #1 spot was going into this season and last.   Sort of why they tried to move on from him last year and couldn't pull it off.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...