Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adam Thielen on Young


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

There were reports during TC, the Panthers were limiting AT reps. Two ways to view- give the young guys growth OR AT has lost another step or two and looking more like a role player at 35 years old.

His wife was dead set on the move. So then was AT and the kids Im sure too.

Tmac took all the targets/snaps/reps and so far it looks like the right move. 

Panthers had 9-10 WRs to fit on 6-7 roster space. 

Panthers got good draft value from a guy that needed to retire at last seasons end. 

Dan/Brad have won 3 trades now....props

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Basbear said:

There were reports during TC, the Panthers were limiting AT reps. Two ways to view- give the young guys growth OR AT has lost another step or two and looking more like a role player at 35 years old.

His wife was dead set on the move. So then was AT and the kids Im sure too.

Tmac took all the targets/snaps/reps and so far it looks like the right move. 

Panthers had 9-10 WRs to fit on 6-7 roster space. 

Panthers got good draft value from a guy that needed to retire at last seasons end. 

Dan/Brad have won 3 trades now....props

Yes

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

If you look at what Thielen said about the currently benched Warrior in a Garden up in Minnesota, pretty clear he’s just a company guy with a mic in his face. 

 

Who would be a company man when the millions/pounds are flowing to your account??

Just common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, toldozer said:

Of course I'm paraphrasing if you heard the interview he backed Dan in to a corner. Could have been a threat to retire vs saying he'd be a jerk. Either way he forced Dan's hand and I'm sure the Vikings were fully aware 

 

Yep. At the end of the day, good riddance to the Thielens. I'm just tired of everyone acting like they are great people or something

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jfra78 said:

He was good at giving Bryce a target that wasn't moving and that's why they worked so well together. AT was great at finding the hole in the defense and sitting in it, but he did nothing after the catch. He is a good number 3 but he is not a number 1 reciever and as long as Bryce is the QB, he would be featured as one.

He was our best YAC guy in 2023 and 4th in 2024(behind Hubbard, Sanders, Coker).

He was a great and productive WR for us because he knows how to play the game, he had a connection with Bryce specifically and our other options have largely been atrocious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, cranky said:

I thought so at the time as well. Of course if the rookies/Legette keep developing than maybe not. At least they got a fourth and fifth round draft pick out of it and the saved 7 million as the Vikings picked up his contract.

My guess is that it cost us in early games, especially with Coker and Sanders out.  But if the QB does get in sync with the younger/new guys, that it could work out well in the end.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

My guess is that it cost us in early games, especially with Coker and Sanders out.  But if the QB does get in sync with the younger/new guys, that it could work out well in the end.  

Not sure I would say lacking him specifically cost us games. Those losses were very much a team effort. 

The AT impact would be more so along the lines of not dropping the passes that TMac has or just generally being a more reliable panic outlet for Bryce. 

Ultimately Bryce has to get some chemistry with non-AT players. That is starting to happen and that's a positive thing overall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Not sure I would say lacking him specifically cost us games. Those losses were very much a team effort. 

The AT impact would be more so along the lines of not dropping the passes that TMac has or just generally being a more reliable panic outlet for Bryce. 

Ultimately Bryce has to get some chemistry with non-AT players. That is starting to happen and that's a positive thing overall. 

No doubt he wouldn't have helped much against Jacksonville or NE, but football like most sports is a game of almost.  One or two clutch catches on that last drive against AZ, and maybe we complete the comeback.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn, am I really going to watch Steeler-Bengals on Amazon in a few minutes? Unfortunately, yes, at least for a little bit.
    • That falls entirely into the chicken-and-egg of why is he not attempting those throws more frequently: is it because he can't make those throws, or because he isn't asked to make those throws? If the latter, is he  not being asked to make those throws because the coaching staff doesn't believe he can be successful with them, or because they don't believe those types of throws fit their scheme anyways? We can eliminate option A because he clearly can physically push the ball 40+ yards, successfully or not, or there would be zero attempts of that nature. We have no way of determining which of the two factors are the reason for option B because we don't know what the coaching staff's ultimate assessment of both his abilities and of their own conviction about the value of those throws irregardless of player would be. Again, you will be hard-pressed to find many coaches that will value a play that has an 83% or higher failure rate just to "keep the defense honest" when they have more valuable and consistent options at their disposal. But the core of my argument is that it's not like it's an impossibility for Bryce to push the ball downfield, it's simply that it's not the amazing cure-all that some seem to imagine it to be even for elite QBs.
    • His ceiling is Alex Smith tier. Not the worst thing to have, but if you have the opportunity to shoot for a Patrick Mahomes you take it.
×
×
  • Create New...