Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Aves 9pm

Panthers Fan 69

By Panthers Fan 69,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Had no business winning that game. TY Freddie 

I disagree. We were down 3 defensemen and 2 forwards. We worked hard and the refs were doing everything possible to make this a game. If we were full strength we win that game by 2 goals. Also, whoever is advising Rod from the truck needs to do a better job. Their second goal, was not a goal.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, philit99 said:

I disagree. We were down 3 defensemen and 2 forwards. We worked hard and the refs were doing everything possible to make this a game. If we were full strength we win that game by 2 goals. Also, whoever is advising Rod from the truck needs to do a better job. Their second goal, was not a goal.

I think he just means down slavin ghost and miller and losing carrier and Robinson Mia game. Having to play 3 rookies while the forwards are double shifting and playing sell out defense.   I watched a team with heart absolutely sucking wind and out of gas. But they hung on.  Full roster, yea we win that by 2-3. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WelshPanther Veteran

WelshPanther

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, philit99 said:

I disagree. We were down 3 defensemen and 2 forwards. We worked hard and the refs were doing everything possible to make this a game. If we were full strength we win that game by 2 goals. Also, whoever is advising Rod from the truck needs to do a better job. Their second goal, was not a goal.

We challenged the goal and lost didn’t we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted (edited)

So, the goal that should not have been a goal....

https://www.nhl.com/news/carolina-hurricanes-colorado-avalanche-coach-challenge-x1595

Challenge Initiated By: Carolina

Type of Challenge: Missed Game Stoppage Event – High-Sticking the Puck

Result: Original call confirmed – Goal Colorado

Explanation: The Situation Room supported the Referee’s call on the ice that Parker Kelly’s stick was not above the normal height of his shoulders when he contacted the puck at 15:31 of the second period (4:29 elapsed time) – 17 seconds prior to his goal. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 80.1.

Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge

------------------------------------------------------------

How the challenge was interpreted as a high stick challenge is beyond me. What I cannot find is what/how RBA challenged the goal and how it was reviewed as a high stick goal when Stevie Wonder could see the hand extending off Kelly's stick, essentially grabbing at the puck and it went by Freddie. 

But the note says, "...17 seconds prior to his goal." So I have no clue that they even looked at the hand goal. 

Edited by Anybodyhome
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DavidEng Grand Master

DavidEng

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

So, the goal that should not have been a goal....

https://www.nhl.com/news/carolina-hurricanes-colorado-avalanche-coach-challenge-x1595

Challenge Initiated By: Carolina

Type of Challenge: Missed Game Stoppage Event – High-Sticking the Puck

Result: Original call confirmed – Goal Colorado

Explanation: The Situation Room supported the Referee’s call on the ice that Parker Kelly’s stick was not above the normal height of his shoulders when he contacted the puck at 15:31 of the second period (4:29 elapsed time) – 17 seconds prior to his goal. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 80.1.

Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge

------------------------------------------------------------

How the challenge was interpreted as a high stick challenge is beyond me. What I cannot find is what/how RBA challenged the goal and how it was reviewed as a high stick goal when Stevie Wonder could see the hand extending off Kelly's stick, essentially grabbing at the puck and it went by Freddie. 

But the note says, "...17 seconds prior to his goal." So I have no clue that they even looked at the hand goal. 

I believe what they were saying is the hand deflection into the goal  was not something a coach could challenge (although the officials could have called for a review of the goal). There were only three criteria a coach could use to challenge a goal and Rod had only a missed stoppage as something he thought he could use. Basically the officials blew it.

IMG_0032.thumb.jpeg.c60499db44501de0265ac7432cd07acb.jpeg

Edited by DavidEng
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 52Beast
      Mike Jackson

      By 52Beast · Posted

      Exactly.  You let him play out next season and continue to develop Thorton.  Jackson’s earned his next contract, but his age and the risk of tying up such a large portion of the payroll at one position leads me to believe that we’ll let him walk. In all likelihood, we’ll draft another CB, or two, and bring in some journeymen to fill the roster void, between now and the start of the 2027 season.  That’ll create more balance financially across the roster enabling us to invest in other areas.  
    • strato
      I’m just not impressed with these hires/openings

      By strato · Posted

      As far as the NFCS … I think this division will be hotly contested the next couple of years.   I am tending to pay more respect to both Atlanta and the Saints n terms of how strong they will be moving forward, than not.    I am mixed on Ryan but think they have a decent roster to start with. I don’t think he blundered hiring Stefanski. And that offense can be dangerous with a QB. Plus, defense is arrow up. No 1st round pick, WB issues will dull their effectiveness. Question is, to what degree?   I think Moore is going to be a good HC and can overcome tape that people have on Shough. They need a lot but they were playing with people. Just the way you want to see all the way to the end.    Not sure about Tampa they have Mayfield but I don’t think they can maintain their success and Bowles is not going to last much longer. They have to go through all that. Gonna be tough once it starts. Might already have started.    For us I feel pretty good about Morgan. But less so about our offense, we have some short term RB and OL issues and those things are critical given what we are working with at QB.  Overall, mixed. Like a lot of what I see but some major question marks remain.     
    • UnluckyforSome
      Panthers WR Xavier Legette named potential trade candidate for 2026 offseason

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Absolutely. If we are talking about a 20 year old youngster. He's a grown-ass man, and he doesn't know what his job entails or how to do it? Maybe he will be better next year! It's the Panther way.
×
×
  • Create New...