Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QBs that would cost next to nothing and are better than anything we currently have.


restNChrist
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

His noodle arm is averaging 7.5 yards per attempt to Bryce’s 5.8

Mac Jones IAY/PA(Intended Air Yards/Pass Attempt) is 7.5

Bryce Young's is 7.7.

So if you want a QB that regularly targets deep passes, Mac Jones is not your guy.

For reference(these stats only exist from 2018 onward) these are some notable other passers in the NFL:

Josh Allen: 8.8

Lamar Jackson: 8.7

Patrick Mahomes: 7.6

Jared Goff: 7.0

CJ Stroud: 8.4

Jayden Daniels: 7.5

Drake Maye: 7.3

Anthony Richardson: 11.2

Sam Howell: 7.5

Jameis Winston: 10.1

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Malik Willis is still an unknown, but Jameis (Pick 6) Winston is an interception waiting for a place to happen.  

Willis is really a 3rd string QB at the moment. He is in a place that suits him, behind a young, potentially franchise QB with no pressure on his development timeline. That is exactly not the case here.

Personally, I highly doubt he will ever develop more than being a middling backup but we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Mac Jones IAY/PA(Intended Air Yards/Pass Attempt) is 7.5

Bryce Young's is 7.7.

So if you want a QB that regularly targets deep passes, Mac Jones is not your guy.

For reference(these stats only exist from 2018 onward) these are some notable other passers in the NFL:

Josh Allen: 8.8

Lamar Jackson: 8.7

Patrick Mahomes: 7.6

Jared Goff: 7.0

CJ Stroud: 8.4

Jayden Daniels: 7.5

Drake Maye: 7.3

Anthony Richardson: 11.2

Sam Howell: 7.5

Jameis Winston: 10.1

What we need is not a guaranteed percentage, it is the capability and willingness to roll deep when the opportunity is there, can be a realistic threat to do that, and thereby keep defenses more honest.
And if/when he sees a guy break open going down the field can adjust his plan and take advantage. 
We don’t see any of that really. Thatks about all I am saying, I rarely express it right. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

What we need is not a guaranteed percentage, it is the capability and willingness to roll deep when the opportunity is there, can be a realistic threat to do that, and thereby keep defenses more honest.
And if/when he sees a guy break open going down the field can adjust his plan and take advantage. 
We don’t see any of that really. Thatks about all I am saying, I rarely express it right. 

That metric would be one of the better indicators of what you are describing. I would disagree what we don't need percentage. Hucking the ball deep for low percentage is just basically Anthony Richardson. You see how much they have improved since he was replaced.

Again, I think most are really hyper focusing on a relatively small aspect of Bryce's flaws. His poor mechanics and his lack of being able to make quick reads lead to the overwhelmingly majority of his lack of success/consistency. His arm strength and targets downfield are much smaller aggravating factors to that lack of success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That metric would be one of the better indicators of what you are describing. I would disagree what we don't need percentage. Hucking the ball deep for low percentage is just basically Anthony Richardson. You see how much they have improved since he was replaced.

Again, I think most are really hyper focusing on a relatively small aspect of Bryce's flaws. His poor mechanics and his lack of being able to make quick reads lead to the overwhelmingly majority of his lack of success/consistency. His arm strength and targets downfield are much smaller aggravating factors to that lack of success.

I think maybe I misinterpreted what the percentage represented because I missed the start of that little thread and it was before I had my coffee. I was responding in the context of a certain percentage of the attempts have to be deep, and I was like well no I don’t think that is required just be willing and able. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Super Grateful said:

Mac Jones is about to be the next Darnold /Mayfield / Jones. Hell, he might even replace the starter on his own team. 

Jones has basically looked like Purdy because Jones and Purdy are about the same level of player. The Niners were idiotic to pay Purdy like a franchise QB. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, strato said:

I think maybe I misinterpreted what the percentage represented because I missed the start of that little thread and it was before I had my coffee. I was responding in the context of a certain percentage of the attempts have to be deep, and I was like well no I don’t think that is required just be willing and able. 

Okay. I see what you mean.

I honestly am just not as fixated on that deep pass element because I do genuinely believe that has largely been a product of the offense slightly more than Bryce himself.

I looked at 20+ yd passes(NFNGS) based on Bryce vs. Dalton. Bryce was actually throwing deep more often, which did surprise me. Not a remarkable amount.

I tend to think the lack of deep targets is more the fault of the offense. I think the lack of general success on deep targets, is Bryce.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Jones has basically looked like Purdy because Jones and Purdy are about the same level of player. The Niners were idiotic to pay Purdy like a franchise QB. 

They both are average to below average QB's, most likely. That offense is just a well oiled machine with a lot of nice toys 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

They both are average to below average QB's, most likely. That offense is just a well oiled machine with a lot of nice toys 

Yep, they're both in that good backup/mediocre starter category. If you put them in a good situation they can be effective game managers with limited upside. Put them in a bad situation and they're gonna look like how Jones has looked in bad situations.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...