Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bryce Young ankle injury is “just a one-week injury”


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

jesus christ, what weird subforum did I stumble upon where people are talking like Dalton is this incredible back up that is going to throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's like we haven't seen him in this role before, and that there is this master plan to fake Bryce's high ankle sprain in order to bench him during a winning season with favorable stats?

People said it about XL so why not Bryce.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

You had me until the literal last 2 words of this post

favorable stats?

Bryce is literally in LAST place in passing yards amongst the QBs who have started every week this season.

But sure, I guess you could consider that "favorable"

What about TD to INT ratio? I don’t care about yards he’s not my fantasy QB and Rico been getting us to the red zone lmao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God could you imagine the reaction if Canales used this ankle tweak as an opportunity to switch to Dalton and not look back. 
 

“No it’s okay Bryce, just sit this one out, your health is most important, bud”

”Man, you know Andy just looked great with those 200 yards and 2 TDs, we just need to put ourselves in the best situation possible.”

Would be funniest thing ever.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

jesus christ, what weird subforum did I stumble upon where people are talking like Dalton is this incredible back up that is going to throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's like we haven't seen him in this role before, and that there is this master plan to fake Bryce's high ankle sprain in order to bench him during a winning season with favorable stats?

The person that said 500 yards was trolling. Some of the responses were not serious. 
If he ends up with 300 or something we are probably getting our butts whipped and it’s garbage time.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

What about TD to INT ratio? I don’t care about yards he’s not my fantasy QB and Rico been getting us to the red zone lmao.

His INT% is about career average(1.9, 2.3, 2.2). It's his TD% that is at a career best(2.1, 3.9, 4.9).

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

What about TD to INT ratio? I don’t care about yards he’s not my fantasy QB and Rico been getting us to the red zone lmao.

It has nothing to do with Fantasy, he's 10th in pass attempts but something like 27th in yards with the only players below him being QB's who haven't started 7 game this year.

There is just flat out no rational way to say that is a good thing and he's playing well, those two stats are a terrible look when put together.

His TD to INT ratio is "good" because he barely throws anything other than little dink and dunk passes.  I'd be very curious to know what his TD to INT ratio is on passes that were more than 10 yards downfield, I'd bet it isn't near as good.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

He has almost as many fumbles already this season as he had all of last season.  At this point it looks like he is regressing with ball security.

I just think defenders know he's fumble prone at this point so there even more emphasis on trying to strip him. It's not like trying to tackle a Cam or Allen or even a Maye or Herbert. You're not really worried about Bryce breaking a tackle and taking off so you're less concerned about securing the tackle allowing you to focus more on trying to get the ball out.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...