Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB options for the 2026 season


CBird
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, strato said:

I am not going to argue and say people don’t do that, but bro… you talking about two games. I am talking about .. all the other ones. 

I haven't looked but im estimated guessing that Daniel Jones only flashed in NY when Barkley was balling out. And now hes doing well in Indy because JT is on pace for 30 TDs. I wasn't replying saying hes poo im just backing the brinks truck up for him in FA 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I haven't looked but im estimated guessing that Daniel Jones only flashed in NY when Barkley was balling out. And now hes doing well in Indy because JT is on pace for 30 TDs. I wasn't replying saying hes poo im just backing the brinks truck up for him in FA 


I don’t understand your contention that Rico’s two great games or Daniel Jones and Taylor’s play have relevance to my point  

Every QB benefits from a great running back. No argument. The point was clear, teams crowd the near field vs Young same as they did with Cam after he lost his gun. Because? They don’t fear being beat deep. 
 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I haven't looked but im estimated guessing that Daniel Jones only flashed in NY when Barkley was balling out. And now hes doing well in Indy because JT is on pace for 30 TDs. I wasn't replying saying hes poo im just backing the brinks truck up for him in FA 

Yeah, Jones got carried by Saquan and now he's being carried by Jonathan Taylor who is probably the MVP at the halfway point of the season. Bryce has basically been ass per usual except when Rico is running for 200 yards.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, csx said:

Distressed assets are quality assets that are undervalued because of current management or ownership. Mayfield seems the perfect example. Browns and Panthers were what limited him. Not him.

Jones and Mayfield were acquired cheaply because of this. 

Young doesn't fit this unless you think hes actually much better than he appears to be.

People forget how terrible Mayfield was here because it’s become popular to idolize him, since he’s found the perfect scenario for himself. But a 74.4 QB rating (worse than Bryce) a 1-1 TD-INT ratio (worse than Bryce) and a .200 win percentage (worse than Bryce somehow!) meant he was actually better than Bryce here. It’s great that people want to improve the QB room because it definitely needs it, if not an overhaul. But the whole “it wasn’t Baker’s fault” has to be from people who didn’t watch in 2022.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

People forget how terrible Mayfield was here because it’s become popular to idolize him, since he’s found the perfect scenario for himself. But a 74.4 QB rating (worse than Bryce) a 1-1 TD-INT ratio (worse than Bryce) and a .200 win percentage (worse than Bryce somehow!) meant he was actually better than Bryce here. It’s great that people want to improve the QB room because it definitely needs it, if not an overhaul. But the whole “it wasn’t Baker’s fault” has to be from people who didn’t watch in 2022.

Wasnt Baker coming off injury when first here…i dont remember 

the Rhule Fitterer years were a hot mess and the franchise is still paying 

both Darnold and Baker csn play, and could play   They rose with better organizations and coaches …neither of which the Panthers had.

 Im not sure what the Panthers have now

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, Jones got carried by Saquan and now he's being carried by Jonathan Taylor who is probably the MVP at the halfway point of the season. Bryce has basically been ass per usual except when Rico is running for 200 yards.

Gonna be interesting to see how the Colts handle that situation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Gonna be interesting to see how the Colts handle that situation 

If they're smart the same way the Vikings should've handled the Darnold situation. Franchise tag. I wouldn't want to pay Jones after one year of good play while being carried by a RB having an MVP caliber season. That would probably prove to be a mistake. The franchise tag might too but at least you're free and clear after a year if it is.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If they're smart the same way the Vikings should've handled the Darnold situation. Franchise tag. I wouldn't want to pay Jones after one year of good play while being carried by a RB having an MVP caliber season. That would probably prove to be a mistake. The franchise tag might too but at least you're free and clear after a year if it is.

Yea seems like the most obvious case of fools gold yet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If they're smart the same way the Vikings should've handled the Darnold situation. Franchise tag. I wouldn't want to pay Jones after one year of good play while being carried by a RB having an MVP caliber season. That would probably prove to be a mistake. The franchise tag might too but at least you're free and clear after a year if it is.

Franchise tag would be insanely expensive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, strato said:

Franchise tag would be insanely expensive. 

A lot less expensive than the mistake of signing the wrong guy to a franchise QB contract. The Giants are still recovering from making that mistake with Jones. $47M in dead cap last year and $22M this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...