Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 11: Panthers @ Falcons Gameday Thread


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

He didn't win alone.

His losses also weren't solely on him.

I'm still undecided.

I am not sold off of one game vs a team he has seemingly owned but still holding back as much as I can to let it play out. Gave the reasons. 
It isn’t the same but there have probably been career .225 hitters that owned HOF pitchers. Ownage is sort of a mystery of the uinverse that has yet to be explained.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Stuart Smith said:

It almost seems like this team is bi-polar. We have a week where the effort is there and the team is focused. The next week it looks like they are walking through the motions. We will find out a lot in the next few weeks. I hope today’s win gives them some confidence. 

Said the same...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, PantherBoy95 said:

You may be thinking of the old rule; now since both teams get a possession it benefits you to kick. That way you know what you need based on what the other team does first with their possession.

I was thinking of the old rule and didn’t see it changed. I’m not as up to date on my football rules as I once was. I can barely watch half the game wrangling and chasing and chauffeuring two kids around if I get a chance to sit and watch it at all

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, strato said:

I am not sold off of one game vs a team he has seemingly owned but still holding back as much as I can to let it play out. Gave the reasons. 
It isn’t the same but there have probably been career .225 hitters that owned HOF pitchers. Ownage is sort of a mystery of the uinverse that has yet to be explained.  

Consistency...

If I see that, I can get on board.

If not... 😕

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AceBoogie said:

You can say it as many times as you want. You on a message board discussing him my guy. Wouldn’t that make you a loser? 

Depends on how I value my time 🤣🤣 

 

I'm a realist I was wait and see on Bryce for two years..... to the point the true Bryce haters looking at you @mrcompletely11 lumped me in with you Bryce stans....

 

These occasional once every 5 weeks okay games (which are still littered with 2-3 deer in the headlight moments)  I know you know football ace you can't look at how teams are defending the Panthers and tell me our opponents have ANY respect for Bryce Young. 

 

Again I'm a realist.... lets say we sneak in the playoffs.... your insane if you think brycey is taking us to a superbowl.... more like a wild card round shutout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...