Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Okay gentlemen, REAL talk...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

My prediction.  We’re gonna win the NFC South and be one and done in the playoffs.  It will buy Bryce the 5th year option.

Plausible...

 

17 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think you're probably right unless we just get stomped the next 4 weeks. 

You know Bryce as been proving people wrong from the time, he was a high school player.  I hope that he continues proving us wrong.  

We do need to hire a forum doctor because the aneurysms that some are going to happen is going to be huge. 🤣

Also plausible 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’ll see how the rest of the year goes, but I have a feeling Geno Smith will be Dalton’s replacement next year and this will be the Panthers handcuff if bad Bryce comes out for any stretch. Smith and Canales have history and Russell Wilson wouldn’t surprise me either. 

Edited by jtm
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

Other than whatever the hell last week was he should be at the top of the COTY list. 

I could see it

 

11 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

Not just winning but winning a game like this.  We had no business being close to this team.  Defense was short handed, online hurt, against the best team in the NFL?  That, might I mention just dominated TB?  Yea, hats off to DC and the entire team.  Perfect game plan and execution!

Pretty much 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jtm said:

We’ll see how the rest of the year goes, but I have a feeling Geno Smith will be Dalton’s replacement next year and this will be the Panthers handcuff if bad Bryce comes out for any stretch. Smith and Canales have history and Russell Wilson wouldn’t surprise me either. 

Not a fan of either choice 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sup said:

Well yeah Tepper is probably not spending much time here (because he can't log back in) but I do think he's sensitive to opinions. 

But anyway, I'm assuming you think we should pick up the option.

You assume wrong.

I think we will. I'm not convinced we should.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...