Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tampa starting LG goes to IR.

UnluckyforSome

By UnluckyforSome,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Say what you want, those turnovers weren't flukes though. Great read by Jackson on the pick 6 and great individual plays by DB on the batted ball INT and strip sack. The Rams are good enough to consistently move that ball against the very best defenses, so of course they are going to be able to move the ball at will with over half of our defense being backups to the backups...

And our offense played a great game. The Packers game was definitely a GB shooting themselves in the foot type of loss for them. I don't think the Rams game was the same - we executed well on offense and came up with the timely turnovers we needed on defense.

Rams only punted once. Without those turnovers they would have scored on every drive. Our defense couldn’t stop anything and was getting sliced up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Rams only punted once. Without those turnovers they would have scored on every drive. Our defense couldn’t stop anything and was getting sliced up. 

Heres a key stat- Rams averaged 7.4 yards each play..... I REPEAT 7.4 YARDS EACH SNAP.

 

I forgot the posters name, but I said a long the lines defense didn't do much outside the TOs...Like watching the game- Rams run play 12 yards. Next play Rams pass for 29. Next play TE screen 7 yards. Just like watching a big college team vs DII team. Panthers on one TO was in the end zone and the fumble was in the red zone too. Rams did it to the cards too, I think the best job in the NFL is being the current rams punter. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, CRA said:

Rams were theoretically licking their chops at our depleted defense last week.....and turned the ball over 3 times.  

I mean, it still a good thing.  Sometimes it takes a week or so for the weak links to really show what makes them so weak.  And sometimes, Derrick Brown is just there and any downgrade is hopefully a problem

I mean, I certainly hope we can exploit it and it plays to our advantage, but this is the NFL, and a division rival.  I still remember a few years back where the Saints lost all their active receivers going into our game.  They elevated two or three guys to start from the practice squad and proceeded to whoop our ass with ease and those PS guys out up numbers.  So, I like to see them banged up, but we definitely can’t mail it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I mean, I certainly hope we can exploit it and it plays to our advantage, but this is the NFL, and a division rival.  I still remember a few years back where the Saints lost all their active receivers going into our game.  They elevated two or three guys to start from the practice squad and proceeded to whoop our ass with ease and those PS guys out up numbers.  So, I like to see them banged up, but we definitely can’t mail it in.

newness of some of weaker players sometimes can work to your advantage for game.  Film and knowing what makes people what matters. 

We didn't pay the price some thought last week vs the Rams w/ an injured defense.  We often see QBs take advantage of being new.  Heck, even someone like Jimmy Horn, saw his best play his first 2 active games on the roster.  I do think film and time is what lets team feasts the most on backups. 

but Derrick Brown is Derrick Brown.  So, you got to think, film and knowing why someone is on the bench might not matter when you can get that ideal matchup.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

got to think Evans rushing back isn't a good thing, unless this is his last hurrah (which I guess that's been hinted at) 

I would be very surprised if this wasn't it for Evans. They do have about $13 mil in void money that will hit their cap next year so they could work something out on a short term deal to lessen that. It will be interesting to see what he decides to do. 

I will certainly be glad to not see him anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherChris Grand Master

PantherChris

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would be very surprised if this wasn't it for Evans. They do have about $13 mil in void money that will hit their cap next year so they could work something out on a short term deal to lessen that. It will be interesting to see what he decides to do. 

I will certainly be glad to not see him anymore.

Evans isnt going to be close to 100% hes just gonna be taking snaps from their younger healthy guys.....  Godwin has already been doing that.... this is a case of subtraction by addition IMO.... not to mention baker cant throw more than 20 yards right now without doubling over in pain from his off shoulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By CRA · Posted

      from my perspective, I call looking at quarterbacks starts when talking about him....and someone calling that manipulating the data, a wild take though.   Think it's the most accurate way to view what you get out of a QB when his team and the opposing team both have game planned w/ that QB in mind and you have the full game.  All these random bits of games distort the statistics IMO.  What does saying Shough is playing surprisingly well mean? Literally nothing outside of our next opponent has a rookie playing surprisingly well (and it's enough we can't dismiss that after a very surprising first game vs us).    and it's not a favor done just for him.  I've always taken out the random games form dudes when talking about them when the sample size is small.  I mean, ask PJ Walker to come in a blowout or start a game and IMO you get 2 very different things out of PJ Walker.   If you are playing against him next week, it's probably best to acknowledge the variant that starts vs inserted late.    
    • NAS
      so yea... the um Saints.... how do we beat them this time?

      By NAS · Posted

      i think this game will have a more balanced attack.  yes, establish the run, but don't be afraid to spread them out early if they stack 8 in the box. 
    • ForJimmy
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Wins losses aren't really on him.  They are what 1-6, 1-7 in games he didn't play.  Again looking at just stats without context is not always the best indicator.  He did what was needed to beat the Bucs last week including a final drive to run out the clock, he picked us apart and he played well against Miami.  The ATL game was pretty bad but overall he has played well these last 4/5 games.  If you are wanting to look at wins they are 2-2 over their last 4 after a 1-8 start.  
×
×
  • Create New...