Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ekwonu doesn’t get dog walked under 2 minutes in the 4th, we drive, kick a FG and win


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, csx said:

Why people are mentioning stepping up

But thats where the monsters are 

 

26 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

Not a player within ten yards.

I dont think Bryce is to blame for the Saints loss but if we look to upgrade the Qb position I won't complain. 

It’s not just the saints losses. It’s the jags loss, and the pats loss, and the cardinals loss, and the 49ers loss, and the games they won where he barely did anything like at home against Atlanta, or at Green Bay.

his career has been either playing a Bryce game where someone else can win it, or playing so badly the team would need a gundam to take the field after the half to win.

year three of this. Btw yesterday was just a Bryce game, the saints just didn’t self destruct and the defense couldn’t manage three turnovers like they did against the falcons, 49ers, rams etc 

Edited by electro's horse
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lef tackle is the BLIND side for right handed QBs. That's why they get paid so much. If your LT is getting dog walked into the QB in 2 seconds, that is not the QB's fault. Geez people. You would only say that about Bryce Young. Truth is Chase was beating Ickey like a drum all game - against the run and the pass. It wasn't speed rushes either. He overpowered him all day. Bryce basically escaped multiple sacks throughout the game. Dalton would have gone down at least 7 or 8 times yesterday, including that play. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The thing about those BY9 GWDs or basically pretty much literally any drive is that any penalty is an instant drive killer. As soon as we have a negative play it's over. Gaining 10 yards in three plays is hard enough already. Make it more and that's a wrap.

 

IMG_4927.jpeg.ddb17aaa7336cbc376ac1dd5fe63a325.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Lef tackle is the BLIND side for right handed QBs. That's why they get paid so much. If your LT is getting dog walked into the QB in 2 seconds, that is not the QB's fault. Geez people. You would only say that about Bryce Young. Truth is Chase was beating Ickey like a drum all game - against the run and the pass. It wasn't speed rushes either. He overpowered him all day. Bryce basically escaped multiple sacks throughout the game. Dalton would have gone down at least 7 or 8 times yesterday, including that play. 

Only took 4 pages but finally someone gets it

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Panthering said:

People blaming Bryce for this is hilarious after seeing Ickey get dog walked like that and I'm far from a Bryce defender! 

Nobody is saying Ickey didn't get beat, but it was wasn't a jailbreak either.  Bryce had some time to escape and he also had an outlet in the flat.  Considering it was single protection, he should have known that ball had to be out quick.  It was a poorly executed play from several aspects.  You can't be inside of two minutes trying to secure the win and think you have all day to pass.  The Saints were NOT going into prevent and that was a miscalculation from play caller down to the execution the botched play.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first down sack wasn’t as big a deal as the five yard check down on second.

Chase young is a good player who made a good play. It happens.

Bryce not understanding the situation is a choice. In his defense he’s been bailed out on check downs all season. Must be confusing for him. Hope he can find solace on street wear TikTok.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol...haters gonna hate:

That sack didn't lose the game but saying that was on BY is ridiculous.

Look at the bottom left on the images. The time from the snap to when Bryce is sacked is 2 seconds at the most. And it was on his blind side. Saying that sack was on him and just showing your hate.

 

36 seconds.png

38 seconds.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, cranky said:

lol...haters gonna hate:

That sack didn't lose the game but saying that was on BY is ridiculous.

Look at the bottom left on the images. The time from the snap to when Bryce is sacked is 2 seconds at the most. And it was on his blind side. Saying that sack was on him and just showing your hate.

 

36 seconds.png

38 seconds.png

Two tings can be true at once.  The protection broke down and Bryce didn't get rid of the ball. Nobody stayed back in protection either, Bryce had to know that, therefore that ball needed to be out ASAP.  He had too much faith in his OL or himself, possibly both.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanders went out on a route and Rico stayed for a second before sneaking out to the flat.  Zero help. Look at Coker crossing the middle.  Bryce is reading the two guys at the top of the screen and I guess they weren't open.  Obviously he didn't see Coker or Rico.  Not sure if Sanders was open.  Inside of two minutes it's first read and if not there, take the outlet.

image.png.2d09c316768463a7d51970f68e27d00f.png

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...