Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Morgan wanted dawgs - we have a roster of yorkies


RevJ
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Bryce needs to get accurate.  He is not anticipating a WR getting open.  he seems "Startled" when he sees an open WR then he rushes the throw because in the NFL, you need to see the WR open before he is open.  Those low throws to Coker, the miss to TMac (pick),etc.  just hard to watch

This is not sound QB play--when the Running game stalls, it shows.

I don't want to see him on the roster next year... don't care what he does to improve...this experiment should be way over....and it would be with any of 31  existing organizations in the league. Much better QBs have been jettisoned after a year of this type of performance. Its absolutely astounding.  They better have a parade of qbs coming in starting February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RevJ said:

After first half of most important game in years:

  • Tampa OL pushing our D Line back enough that their RB has several yards before being disturbed =Yorkies
  • Tampa DL pushing out O Line beck into backfield. - Poodles
  • Tampa may need to call a TO during a play because Baker and WR running around undisturbed long enough that they get tired. - Dogs chasing their own tails
  • Tet drops ball / Leggette stops jogging on route - dachsunds
  • Our guys keep falling, Bucs look like playing on dry field. - Pugs
  • Jackson giving 15 yard cushion - but gets there in enough time to run his mouth and get 15 yard penalty. - yapping dog / Chihuahua
  • Mayfield is impossible to tackle - dogs with seeing eye owners

    Real dawgs - German Shepherds, Pit Bulls. Rottweilers - Derrick Brown (we already had him) / Rico Dowdle (but not in first half) / Maybe Sirr Purr - cat with size and looks of dog


 

 

We have the highest paid OL in the league and they are average to above average most of the time; they should be elite all of the time.  I really thought Hunt would play.  I am so tired of Corbett watching the QB get pressured by the man he was supposed to block.  

XL is terrible.  He seems surprised when the ball comes his way. 

I blame the traction on the person in charge of equipment.  They have an hour or so before the game to test cleats/traction.  I dunno.  The Flea Flicker was a crazy idea in these horrible conditions.  Let's have the RB get a handoff and then turn his back to the DTs and toss it back to a 5'8" QB in the rain to see if he can find an open receiver to trick em.  We were moving the ball.  Dumb. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Fright said:

Unfortunately we do not have a dawg in the positions that matter most. QB, MLB, and HC.

I was very disappointed in DC for not arguing the "ball went out of bounds" ruling.

Secondly, over the past few weeks I have commented (probably too frequently) about how dumb this team is.  Anyone in youth league knows that you run with the ball if there is a chance the pass is actually a lateral.  Rico just stood there.   Last week, there were the dumb mistakes like the facemask on third and 20 or so.  We have hit sliding QBs to lose a game.  We make stupid mistakes.  Now the coach seems to say nothing.  He calls a flea flicker when we are driving in the rain.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The Lobo said:

Lack playmakers on D, it’s a miracle we’ve won 8 games. They have been punching up all year, it catches up with us eventually. 

No real factors at ILB and only a second-round rookie providing pressure off the edge (4 sacks, but he held the edge and got a lot of pressures).  

I was disappointed in the DL most of the time, but I saw some bright spots.  Derrick Brown is the best DT (DE) we have ever had.  Jackson (NT) came on strong.  Brown?  Wharton?  Where were they this year?  Wharton was abysmal.  Brown was not a lot better.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...