Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Free Agency


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

He had an Achilles injury in 2024.  Smart player.  Good pass protector. had a down year in 2025.    Has never played between two guards like Lewis and Hunt--should cost under $8m.  At 28, he has 5 years left.  I am not against it if we can get him for about $5m per.  

I just looked at that, you probably did too. Time for the back channel scuttlebutt and see if we can find out how that Achilles was holding up. And whatever else.
 

New coaches and people are saying it signals a scheme fit. I got no clue what they were doing in Tennessee. 

It also said he was due 8 million this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, toldozer said:

Bryce cannot see the spot in the field where tight ends are most likely to be effective. Prime hall of fame tight ends would do Jack with Bryce. No point in bringing any good ones in

Yet the playbook isn’t limited. Technically I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

interesting point.  going to think about it because I have not up to this point.  

Bryce is just an overall significant limitation on our offense. No way to sugarcoat it. We can either choose to keep trying to figure out bandaid around it or move on. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bryce is just an overall significant limitation on our offense. No way to sugarcoat it. We can either choose to keep trying to figure out bandaid around it or move on. 

I look at the QB situations in Miami and Arizona--and do not see bryce rising above that.

If Simpson is there in the first--do you pull the trigger?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2026 at 11:18 PM, toldozer said:

Bryce cannot see the spot in the field where tight ends are most likely to be effective. Prime hall of fame tight ends would do Jack with Bryce. No point in bringing any good ones in

That's just not true. It may feel that way to you, but if you look at his passing charts, most games he's completing more passes in the middle of the field than the outside. Even in his 100 yards stinkers he's completing more passes over the middle than the outside. Probably gets more yards throwing outside the numbers, but he usually completes more passes over the middle. A tight end that knows how to post up and box out for the ball would definitely help. In my opinion, he needs to take more deep shots outside the numbers and less short passes between the numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Stuart Smith said:

Moton is on record as saying he does not want to play left tackle if my memory serves me correctly. 

I don’t recall him saying that. I do recall when he was a rookie/2nd year that he said he was working to know the entire OL. That said, that was a long time ago and at this point, moving him around seems counterproductive. It’s not 2018 or 2019 when it seemed to make sense and he played well at LT when he had to do so due to injuries.

This is Moton’s 10th year, no point. We need to draft multiple tackles at this point with no idea how Iky comes back in 2027.

Edited by WhoKnows
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...