Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Panthers have interest in Deebo Samuel


Recommended Posts

last year there was an unproar amongst a few popular twitter accounts we didn't sign Samuel 

they never commented again but these are the same accounts that think we can literally sign/trade/draft every single player and when one of them pans out they say "SEE? SEE?"

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think its kinda funny everyone was talking on here about purdy sucks and he has the best wrs and fast forward turns out all his wrs were pretty much trash.  still has an amazing te rb duo but purdy has proven to be a top ten qb in the nfl could be a top 5.  he pretty much had no one this year was injured alot and still 2nd best qbr in the nfl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/26/2026 at 7:57 AM, fanpanther said:

i think its kinda funny everyone was talking on here about purdy sucks and he has the best wrs and fast forward turns out all his wrs were pretty much trash.  still has an amazing te rb duo but purdy has proven to be a top ten qb in the nfl could be a top 5.  he pretty much had no one this year was injured alot and still 2nd best qbr in the nfl. 

Deebo still had a decent year given the QB situation. Hes not trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Hes locker room trash

Im in no way advocating for him. The post I was responding to seemed to imply all of Purdy's targets suck and he made them who they are. Purdy is much better than the Huddle wants him to be and he has also had good players around him.  Kittle, CMC, Ayuk, Jennings are no slouches and Deebo had by far his best year with Garoppolo not Purdy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Freedom of discussion aside, I mean people have every right to discuss any potential player… he is 30 and his best seems to be behind him.
Sure, he can be as good once as he ever was, but we haven’t been doing this with anyone from the outside unless I’m forgetting. He doesn’t fit the obvious profile of what the bosses will sponsor.  We’ve been doing guys still in their mid 20s who have some headroom on that 30 ceiling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, csx said:

Purdy is much better than the Huddle wants him to be

Why do people still line up to simp for this guy? Did our game against the 49ers where he had 3 picks and a Bryce Youngesque stat line not make it clear enough for you that he is a game manager at absolute best?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, frankw said:

Why do people still line up to simp for this guy? Did our game against the 49ers where he had 3 picks and a Bryce Youngesque stat line not make it clear enough for you that he is a game manager at absolute best?

Brook is 4x the QB BY wants to be. He's been in the top 12 since his first snap, Id nearly let Juan murder someone for that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...