Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Top 30 Visits and Draft Tracker


XClown1986
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know he wasn’t a 30 visit, but we did have a virtual meet with De’Zhaun Stribling. I like what DJ & Sikkema have said about him being a slot or Z WR that can take the top off a D.

They brought up how once Ole Miss got right with Chambliss, that he really stepped up. I don’t know as much about him as the other WRs but could be a value on day 2 giving Bryce that speedster without sacrificing pick 19.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I would not mind it, but I just don't see it.  

I see TE Delp here in round 4.  I might go with Cooper (WR) in round 1.  Travis Burke (was he a local visit?  Played at Gardner-Webb for a while--I see him as a 6th or 7th).  It sure looks like Safety could be the round 2 pick --I was hoping to grab a LB there--QB?  We are going to bring in a UDFA.  

Of course, this is probably totally wrong.  

I think they go defense in rounds 1 and 2. Then offense in rounds 3 and 4. Positions are yet to be determined. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I think they go defense in rounds 1 and 2. Then offense in rounds 3 and 4. Positions are yet to be determined. 

I wanted DT and LB then maybe a C. 

I also think someone will fall to 19 and make it difficult to stick to WR.   An OT, perchance?

Recent interest (seemingly) in WR suggests that they are giving up on XL.  If so, I see WR as a big need since they want to surround their MiniQB with $200m worth of talent.

I see Morgan rebuilding the OL in 2027 because he will have to make cap room for the $50m qb.  Moton, Hunt, and maybe Lewis?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It should be a facto, because while he needs to perform to keep his job, you still have to build with an eye to the future. Where we will be drafting, there is a more than good chance of there being a player there at a position of more need, such as OT, LB, TE, S, or CB. With all those holes, I just don’t like the idea of taking a player who will ensure one of him, T-Mac, or Coker won’t be here 4 years from now, and we all know it won’t be T-Mac who gets jettisoned. So either believe in Coker or don’t, keep him and draft another position or draft a WR and trade him, don’t straddle the middle and hamstring us by leaving more holes while leaving us a huge problem a couple years from now.
    • Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
×
×
  • Create New...