Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Fowler: Panthers draft day intel


Recommended Posts

Jeremy Fowler draft intel on the Panthers:

“Carolina was high on Proctor. If he somehow slipped to 19, he was a viable option.”

“Caleb Lomu was on the Panthers short list too.”

“Panthers weren’t totally comfortable with Stowers there at 49.”
 

https://x.com/panthersontap/status/2049827264972353727?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would look at them sideways if they took a TE in the second over filling the hole they made by cutting A’Shawn. 

And secondarily (if DL wasn’t really there), placing TE over ILB in that round.  

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Jeremy Fowler draft intel on the Panthers:

“Carolina was high on Proctor. If he somehow slipped to 19, he was a viable option.”

“Caleb Lomu was on the Panthers short list too.”

“Panthers weren’t totally comfortable with Stowers there at 49.”
 

https://x.com/panthersontap/status/2049827264972353727?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA

I'm actually surprised the Panthers were even interested in Stowers since he has no chance of ever being a Y TE.

I do think they were interested in the likes of Delp and Raridon, but they didn't want to use a day 2 pick on either of them (which I understand).

Was hoping we could have gotten Raridon in round 4, but it is what it is. This is probably the best I have felt about a draft for the Panthers in a very long time

Edited by PleaseCutStewart
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...