Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where do you think Rivera lies on the Fox/Coughlin discipline scale?


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

Two very opposite coaches. Coughlin coaches the Giants like a damn drill sergeant. He's not very player friendly (numerous players have had conflicts with him, including our own Jeremy Shockey). Coughlin is known for running tough training camps that suck the energy out of players so their unit is pretty much fatigued by december. While he is definitely a top 10 coach, and his philosophy has served him pretty well, he has a tendency to overkill.

Fox on the other hand, not really a hard ass coach. He breaks training camp a week early and wonders why the offense can't break 300 total yards by week 3. Training camp seems to go by much less intense relative to other teams' camps, and our team has looked very sloppy in the regular season. The locker room atmosphere he creates is very much benign and lax most of the time, but sometimes outspoken players criticize it openly (Jenkins, Buckner)

Enter Ron Rivera. A coach with military history. Of course we can expect more attention to detail and discipline the likes of which Fox has been incapable of providing, but Ron doesn't look like the kind of guy that will throw his hat at the ground and throw a conniption if a WR lines up wrong during a drill either. He definitely falls somewhere in the middle of these two mentalities. Just where do you think he lies is what i'm asking, vote on the poll. Poll options will be ordered from sweetest pies (Fox) to the most bitter (Coughlin)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to vote for apple pie. Who could say no to apple pie?

On a serious note, I think he'll on the Coughlin end of the scale. Mid-high I think. I think I like it that way though. If he's a listener like he says he is, there's no problem in being a little tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coughlin has his players under control???

Every year those clowns are about to rip each others throats out.

Seems super discplined to me that one of his players threw his helmet in the crowd.

It is one thing to yell and be intimidating or look like an "angry possum" like he does, but to actually have control is another thing.

However, I believe Rivera is going to be a very tough coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have to look at the public versus private elements as well.

Fox would rip guys in private but not in public. Coughlin doesn't do it as much as he used to but he tended to rip guys in public which is why players used to hate him.

He also tended to discipline folks for the sake of discipline and had a 100 rules. Fox tended to have underlining principles and rules but was more flexible.

Rivera seems like a disciplinarian and closer to Coughlin than Fox on that aspect. However his players liked him and felt positive about him as a players coach. He is known to rip players when they come off the field but doesn't single them out in public or use the media to communicate.

Should be interesting to see what happens especially if the team struggles to win and the pressure uilds on him. Most guys show their true colors when things are going badly not when the team is winning.

Rivera seems big on accountability but given he played the game knows how it is to play the game for a Buddy Ryan who surely let you know how he felt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two very opposite coaches. Coughlin coaches the Giants like a damn drill sergeant. He's not very player friendly (numerous players have had conflicts with him, including our own Jeremy Shockey). Coughlin is known for running tough training camps that suck the energy out of players so their unit is pretty much fatigued by december. While he is definitely a top 10 coach, and his philosophy has served him pretty well, he has a tendency to overkill.

This is not entirely true. While authoritarian when it comes to rule, Coughlin gets represented as being pretty fair and loyal to his players. Shanahan would be the better hyperbole...

"They both have somewhat militant styles," Thomas said of the head coaches. "But I feel like Coughlin, he doesn't put a hammer down if you make a mistake. Shanahan was real tough on guys. If you make a mistake or something happens, he just drills you about it.

"Coach Coughlin, he kind of lets it slide. He kind of lets it roll off because he knows you're going to come back and fix it."

Wow, a football player who considers Coughlin understanding, flexible, and maybe even a bit too soft.

"Firm, fair, honest, demanding," Coughlin said of his approach as he stood outside the winners' locker room. "I try to be consistent. No matter how difficult it goes, I try to maintain our course and keep people motivated, and we don't fluctuate back and forth. I try to keep it just the way it's presented to the players originally."

http://sports.espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/columns/story?columnist=oconnor_ian&id=5889619

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...