Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Clausen and Weis had stayed another year in ND.


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

Wouldn't we be SUPER FukeD? At least we only have a mid of the pack second rounder invested into him, imagine if it was the first pick in the draft! Discuss how fortunate we are, I think Clausen will pan out one day, but could you imagine if he was in the running this year and being a Senior, pro style, imagining he would have put up good numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just glad no one let hurney back in the 1st round last year to grab him. We could be sitting here without a 1 or a 2. Yikes!

I kind of doubt that, had he been able to trade up for Clausen, he still would have traded up for A Money.

But yeah, thank God he couldn't find a willing trading partner for that deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if Luck comes out and has a bad rookie year will everyone start saying he is worthless as well? Clausen's year in review:

1) offensive line that all of a sudden forgot how to block

2) WR's that were learning how to run routes

3) Vet WR mouthing off to QB on and off the field

4) O coordinator that considers a screen a downfield risky play

5) same fans that were calling for him to start the season writing him off after 4 games

6) Lastly, learning a completely new offense and adjusting to the speed of the NFL

Yes he stunk last year but writing any player off after one year is crazy. Do I think we should mortgage our future on Clausen - No, but you can't scapegoat him for last year. Tom Brady would not have done much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of doubt that, had he been able to trade up for Clausen, he still would have traded up for A Money.

But yeah, thank God he couldn't find a willing trading partner for that deal.

I was saying we traded our 2nd for Edwards so more than likely we would have had to give up a first to get back into the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if Luck comes out and has a bad rookie year will everyone start saying he is worthless as well? Clausen's year in review:

1) offensive line that all of a sudden forgot how to block

2) WR's that were learning how to run routes

3) Vet WR mouthing off to QB on and off the field

4) O coordinator that considers a screen a downfield risky play

5) same fans that were calling for him to start the season writing him off after 4 games

6) Lastly, learning a completely new offense and adjusting to the speed of the NFL

Yes he stunk last year but writing any player off after one year is crazy. Do I think we should mortgage our future on Clausen - No, but you can't scapegoat him for last year. Tom Brady would not have done much better.

Hey bud, im not saying Clausen won't ever pan out, I'm just saying, it would be a terrible situation had stars aligned and we used the number one pick on him this year. He is obviously not a Sam Bradford type franchise player, but he might be a Jake Delhomme or a Tony Romo in a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just glad no one let hurney back in the 1st round last year to grab him. We could be sitting here without a 1 or a 2. Yikes!

just an fyi, the reason he didn't trade up in the first or in the second to get Clausen was because he REFUSED to trade our #1 this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we'd likely have taken Golden Tate at the 48 spot last year if Clausen had stayed in school. We'd also likely have signed a vet as insurance (maybe McCown).

Looking at how Tate did in his first year vs Brandon LaFell, I'd say that at least for the moment, it looks like we got the better of that deal (time will tell). I would say though that I'd much rather have had a vet backup last year rather than a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...