Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayock expects “feeding frenzy” for quarterbacks


eViL jEsTeR

Recommended Posts

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/20/mayock-expects-feeding-frenzy-for-quarterbacks/

“I think there’s a panic among teams that need quarterbacks. The worst thing you can do is reach for a quarterback and miss,” Mayock said.

This would play into our hands if we would make it clear we didn't want Newton and wanted to trade. A desperate team knowing they won't get one of the top 3 or 4 might be more willing to leapfrog everyone. But if all we hear is Newton, Newton, Newton.... then nobody would be willing to trade assuming we're not even open to a trade because we're set on Newton. Hurney is making a big mistake not making it public that we would openly entertain and prefer to trade. that would send teams scrambling and maybe one would panic. If not, we could always still draft Newton, or Dareus or whoever.

I don't like they way they are playing this so close to the vest without even seeming to aknowledge that the pick is for sale to the highest bidder. Maybe they're waiting till the day before to create a feeding frenzy but that approach might backfire. I'd love for them to open it up a week ahead of time to give teams to drive the price up on each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they are playing it quite well in regards to trading. We may still be undecided on the best way to try to trade down or with which team we have the best option to trade with, so keeping our intentions vague until the last second is most likely our best option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also predicts that we won't be part of it (link)

NFL Network’s Mike Mayock, for one, isn’t convinced the Panthers will take Newton.

“I feel very strongly that Carolina would like to trade out of the No. 1 overall pick,” Mayock said on a conference call Wednesday.

If the Panthers keep the pick, Mayock thinks they still might not take Newton. He believes Marcell Dareus and Patrick Peterson would be the other options there, interestingly not mentioning A.J. Green.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/20/mayock-expects-feeding-frenzy-for-quarterbacks/

This would play into our hands if we would make it clear we didn't want Newton and wanted to trade. A desperate team knowing they won't get one of the top 3 or 4 might be more willing to leapfrog everyone. But if all we hear is Newton, Newton, Newton.... then nobody would be willing to trade assuming we're not even open to a trade because we're set on Newton. Hurney is making a big mistake not making it public that we would openly entertain and prefer to trade. that would send teams scrambling and maybe one would panic. If not, we could always still draft Newton, or Dareus or whoever.

I don't like they way they are playing this so close to the vest without even seeming to aknowledge that the pick is for sale to the highest bidder. Maybe they're waiting till the day before to create a feeding frenzy but that approach might backfire. I'd love for them to open it up a week ahead of time to give teams to drive the price up on each other.

It could work the exact opposite way too. Teams see that we like Newton when they do too, and they'd be willing to see what it takes to get him from us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think its strange that so many teams are reaching for a QB since while the lock out is going on they cant practice or get any work done

Teams will make sure that their newly aquired QB will get a copy of their playbook even if it's against NFL rules. I can assure you that. They were discussing that on NFL network a week ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, I think several QB's will be over drafted...like all of them.

Not only will the top two be reaches, but most of the second tier guys will go way before their value.

And considering that they will receive no coaching till CBA is in place, they will probably not get on the field till next season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/20/mayock-expects-feeding-frenzy-for-quarterbacks/

This would play into our hands if we would make it clear we didn't want Newton and wanted to trade. A desperate team knowing they won't get one of the top 3 or 4 might be more willing to leapfrog everyone. But if all we hear is Newton, Newton, Newton.... then nobody would be willing to trade assuming we're not even open to a trade because we're set on Newton. Hurney is making a big mistake not making it public that we would openly entertain and prefer to trade. that would send teams scrambling and maybe one would panic. If not, we could always still draft Newton, or Dareus or whoever.

I don't like they way they are playing this so close to the vest without even seeming to aknowledge that the pick is for sale to the highest bidder. Maybe they're waiting till the day before to create a feeding frenzy but that approach might backfire. I'd love for them to open it up a week ahead of time to give teams to drive the price up on each other.

False. The worst thing Hurney could do is let everyone know that we aren't interested in the first pick. That would lessen the value, unless there are multiple teams inquiring the pick. The best thing he could do is make everyone assume we like Cam or Bland, teams would have to give up more to obtain our pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...