Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton's dad will finally get PAID!


Darth Bobo

Recommended Posts

It is a great day in the Newton household, and all that networking and marketing of his son's skills will finally have paid off. Maybe he'll go get himself a laptop computer (at a store) so he can keep up to date on all the stats on his son.

Nah, just kiddin'. I do wish him the best, and expect great things from him. Wanted to post this thread last night, but the forum wasn;t working for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a great day in the Newton household, and all that networking and marketing of his son's skills will finally have paid off. Maybe he'll go get himself a laptop computer (at a store) so he can keep up to date on all the stats on his son.

Nah, just kiddin'. I do wish him the best, and expect great things from him. Wanted to post this thread last night, but the forum wasn;t working for me.

lol, finally getting paid? you mean paid again don't you?

Cam ain't the first or last Panther that got paid while in college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having an education paid for doesn't count?

yes and no.

Not fair to say since we are paying your tuition while you play football.......you can't get a job so that you will be able to live a normal lifestyle. Not every student has parents makin in rain.....some need to make their own money. NCAA creates a toxic enviroment imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having an education paid for doesn't count?

The NCAA rules regarding maintaining amateur status clearly say that no student athlete may take a gift in any form from any company, agent or individual on the basis of their status as a student athlete. Plainly, Cam Newton is not allowed to accept free movie tickets because he is Cam Newton. In that way, the NCAA rules restrict players from making money off of who they are and thereby, the argument proceeds, maintain their amateur status.

You'd be a fool, though, to think that the NCAA and those major schools aren't making money off of Cam Newton, though he can't make money off of himself. If you've ever played any NCAA football game, you'll notice that the players don't have names, they're just numbers. That is all because of the NCAA rules.

It should also be noted that not every student-athlete gets their education paid for in full.

It is a great thing that some of these athletes get their education for free, though many of them don't utilize that. A lot of major college recruits see college as a way to get into the pros and don't appreciate college for it's educational value.

That's partly the NCAA's fault too. The requirements that student-athletes have to meet to remain academically eligible are ridiculous. You don't even have to have a 2.0 GPA until you're a JUNIOR. You can skate by with a 1.8 your freshman year and a 1.9 your sophomore year.

It is unfair of the NCAA to tell a student-athlete that they can't accept some $10 movie tickets, else risk being ruled ineligible, but the NCAA stands to make millions on its most celebrated athletes. That being said, so long as the NCAA policies are in place, it's my belief that student-athletes should have to conform to them, regardless of their perceived fairness. The right way to go about making a change in the NCAA is not to just disregard the policy. The NCAA is so much more powerful than even it's strongest schools and student-athletes.

yes and no.

Not fair to say since we are paying your tuition while you play football.......you can't get a job so that you will be able to live a normal lifestyle. Not every student has parents makin in rain.....some need to make their own money. NCAA creates a toxic enviroment imo.

Who says student athletes can't have jobs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You guys are just going to have to accept the fact that Dan Morgan is a mid GM best case scenario currently. I used to have people get very belligerent over defending Scott Fitterer too. And that's not hyperbole. People used to go to bat for that guy like he was blood related. We have a truckload invested in the OL and what do we have to show for it? The whole unit is already banged up including one of our big signings. Even without all that the group has largely taken a step back from last year in pass protection. Then you get to the QB room and there's only two conclusions you can make about Dan Morgan. Either he deliberately ignored it two years in a row on his own accord or he took orders from Tepper to do so. Either scenario says he's not fit to be an NFL GM.
    • Frank, ceding control of the defense in no way verifies that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.    It certainly buttresses the idea that Canales would need permission to bench him but that is as far as you can take it.    After that it is pure speculation and it doesn’t make sense. 
    • Uhh, okay yes that happened. I didn’t like the pick either I am a 3rd or later RB guy. Always. Actually hated the CMC pick too. Hated the Stewart pick.  No one wants to talk about trading the #39 in that draft and what he did with that.  Got #52, #155, and the Rams 2025 2nd to boot.   The 52 and 155 plus our 142 5th rounder to go up for a Brooks Everyone wants to forget about the 2025 2nd for that Rams trade  which was used to move up for Scourton.  That Rams trade down was a great deal for us.     
×
×
  • Create New...