Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ryan Kalil Supporting Jake Delhomme

PantherBoy95

By PantherBoy95,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
Posted

Never thought of this. I think it's a good idea, but only if he doesn't play... Sorry, I just don't think he's the second coming of a Kurt Warner. We'd prolly get him on the cheap as well. I know he loves this organization from top to bottom.

Edit: after letting it marinate for a couple minutes I think this is genius. He already has everyone's respect here... It's not like he'd be the fugin new guy, that when he talks, people will be like, why is this guy even opening his mouth? His work ethic was awesome and he will instantly gel with everybody. I can see him being in the mentoring role just because if the guy he is... I can't get his ginL press conference outta my head right now. The way he cried really got to me... Looking back, it's something we needed to do with his huge contract...

Man I think this would be a CLASSY move by Ron... I know the big cat loved him. He was over there at his house all the time. They had a great relationship.

Who started this thread? Instant swag! I think this would be a great move by the organization.

I am looking forward to those that disagree for various reasons that they will try to explain to me like I have no idea about his career...

I am 100% behind this move and really hope we do it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catalyst Newbie

Catalyst

Posted
Posted

I for one would welcome Jake's presence as a mentor to Cam. Would be a nice bridge from the past to the future. I mean, if you consider what we're looking for in other veteran QB's - experienced, mentor-ready, high-character guy - then why wouldn't Jake be at the top of our list?

The only reason I can see for not wanting him back would be if you think the QB we sign will actually end up playing. I've never felt that way, so as far as I'm concerned bring Jake back. I've always loved the idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chef17 Apprentice

chef17

Posted
Posted

Never thought of this. I think it's a good idea, but only if he doesn't play... Sorry, I just don't think he's the second coming of a Kurt Warner. We'd prolly get him on the cheap as well. I know he loves this organization from top to bottom.

Edit: after letting it marinate for a couple minutes I think this is genius. He already has everyone's respect here... It's not like he'd be the fugin new guy, that when he talks, people will be like, why is this guy even opening his mouth? His work ethic was awesome and he will instantly gel with everybody. I can see him being in the mentoring role just because if the guy he is... I can't get his ginL press conference outta my head right now. The way he cried really got to me... Looking back, it's something we needed to do with his huge contract...

Man I think this would be a CLASSY move by Ron... I know the big cat loved him. He was over there at his house all the time. They had a great relationship.

Who started this thread? Instant swag! I think this would be a great move by the organization.

I am looking forward to those that disagree for various reasons that they will try to explain to me like I have no idea about his career...

I am 100% behind this move and really hope we do it!

Many here have said in the past that it's a waste of a roster spot on a guy you won't play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...