Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What about Cam will revolutionize the game?

SorthNarolina

By SorthNarolina,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SorthNarolina Newbie

SorthNarolina

Posted
Posted

I remember this term being thrown around a lot before we drafted him. I still have really figured out what makes him so special in those terms.

Manning is like a hybrid OC/QB that's revolutionary.

Vick is one of the most mobile quarterbacks ever but he can also throw the ball, that's revolutionary.

Cam just seems like Culpepper, McNabb, Freeman, or Young(Steve and Vince) kind of QB. I can see him being very good even HoF, but I don't see how he is going to change the way football is played. Seems like he's just going to be really good.

I think his ability to extend plays and Smith's(if he stays) tenacious desire for the ball could turn into something ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

some people think he is a better runner than Vick and could become as good a passer as Manning(edit: in time, only a few insane people think that would happen right away). I assume they also think that includes the OC bit. I think all of that is a tremendous stretch to project that for any rookie, especially one we haven't seen play all that much, but hey whatever. I think it's more likely his game follows the lines of VY or Big Ben (or the others you named before injuries etc), because I don't expect him to be able to run like he did in college, but I could be wrong.

I think that is how it went anyway; something about how his ability to move the chains with his legs and his arm would make him impossible to defend for any length of time. I think that people like Teeray who said things like that were more speaking about how quarterbacks in this league *seem* like they are moving more towards a player who can extend plays by avoiding pressure etc until they find an opening which in turn is forcing defenses to change how they play quarterbacks and how they rush them, and that if EVERYTHING went perfectly for Cam he could be the one to really push that over the edge. There are others who just think Cam Newton is the best fuging thing ever and he's already on his way to the Hall of Fame, but many more reasonable fans have reasons for thinking he will be more than just "special."

me? Well, I'm gonna wait until I see him play in the NFL. I guess that's cheating, but I've seen too many amazing college players be completely humbled in the NFL to do more than just hope he transitions as well as others believe he will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SorthNarolina Newbie

SorthNarolina

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I know you are bored and of course this is the worst month for sports, but do you really want to start one of these topics again?

I don't understand how these topics turn so sour in the first place. It shouldn't be that hard to discuss players without the whole discussion falling apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

I don't understand how these topics turn so sour in the first place. It shouldn't be that hard to discuss players without the whole discussion falling apart.

it usually boils down to people making stupid claims or stupid comments about either Cam, or the other players on the roster he'll have to win the job from. It feels like any and all objectivity left whatever the 'debate' was about Cam way before he was even drafted. At this point, it all feels so stale, a lot of people have just taken to trolling each other instead of discussing because of the circles we go in over this stuff. (no offense to you for making the post, I understand how you mighta missed the only semi-decent explanation I heard for that crazy talk during the draft, and as Teeray can tell you, I still thought it was crazy at the time :P)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

How could Newton redefine the Qb position? Typically the QB in the NFL has been a drop back pure passer who was not particularly athletic or a gifted athlete. They were prized for their leadership and their ability to read defenses and throw the ball. All great characteristics and needed for the position. However, they rarely made plays with athletic ability. There have been guys in the past like Randall Cunningham, Culpeppers, Moon, and more who were black quarterbacks who were very athletic and brought elements to the position but lacked the total package. For example Cunningham was very elusive but wasn't a great passer and was injury prone being 6'5" and only 215 lbs. Vick redifined the position as a running quarterback but until last year was a good passer and didn't understand the complexity of the WCO.

What distinguished Newton as having the possibility to redefine the position is that he is very athletic and can run better than most any quarterback except for Vick. But he has the ability to throw the ball as well as most pure passers coming out of college. So he has both the running skills and the passing skills which makes him somewhat unique. He has the size of guys like Roethlisburger but is more athletic. As a result he has the possibility to redefine the position. He may not do anything but the thread is about what is special about him not whether he will in fact revolutionalize the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

What distinguished Newton as havig the possibility to redefine the position is that he is very athletic and can run better than most any quarterback except for Vick. But he has the ability to throw the ball as well as most pure passers coming out of college. So he has both the running skills and the passing skills which makes him somewhat unique. He has the size of guys like Roethlisburger but is much more athletic. As a result he has the possibility to redefine the position. He may not do anything but the thread is about what is special about him not whether he will in fact revolutionalize the position.

In my opinion, that is a gross overstatement of his abilities. His passing game is largely overrated based on some numbers that don't translate to how good a passer he is.

He has the chance to develop into a good passer, but at this moment, he's behind the "pure passers" as you call them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
twylyght Rookie

twylyght

Posted
Posted

I remember this term being thrown around a lot before we drafted him. I still have really figured out what makes him so special in those terms.

Manning is like a hybrid OC/QB that's revolutionary.

Vick is one of the most mobile quarterbacks ever but he can also throw the ball, that's revolutionary.

Cam just seems like Culpepper, McNabb, Freeman, or Young(Steve and Vince) kind of QB. I can see him being very good even HoF, but I don't see how he is going to change the way football is played. Seems like he's just going to be really good.

I think his ability to extend plays and Smith's(if he stays) tenacious desire for the ball could turn into something ridiculous.

If he can be Rothl... without the rape charges, that would be good enough for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
Posted

He's not revolutionizing anything. But imagine Roethlisburger running like Brandon Jacobs. In college, Newton ran with speed and power, but unless the play was called for running, he was a pass-first guy.

What really made him great is what we saw from Jake in his prime. As it got toward crunch time, he got better. He found ways to make the first down, and get the ball into the end zone. He made everyone around him better, anyone watching Aurburn football could tell that the entire team believed he would get it done, and played harder for it.

So take a big, mobile, strong-armed athletic QB with great intangibles and see if he can learn the playbook and how to decipher NFL defenses. If he can, then don't worry about whether he'll revolutionize the game. Because if he can figure out how to move the ball in the NFL like he did in college, he won't need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

In my opinion, that is a gross overstatement of his abilities. His passing game is largely overrated based on some numbers that don't translate to how good a passer he is.

He has the chance to develop into a good passer, but at this moment, he's behind the "pure passers" as you call them.

Is there a QB coming out of college in the 2010 draft or back in the 2009 draft that you can honestly say is signifcantly ahead of Cam as a passer when looking at them translating into the NFL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

He's already revolutionized message boards.

I think Vick stole his thunder on becoming an "elite" passer and runner AND on message boards.

Like others have said, I don't know if he'll revolutionize the position, but if he plays it at a high level with the gifts he's been given, he'll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • rayzor
      Houston Texans... You Suck!!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      oof
    • Icege
      How would you feel if Bryce did this in 2025

      By Icege · Posted

      These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • WhoKnows
      Clowney released

      By WhoKnows · Posted

      If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
×
×
  • Create New...