Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pat Yasinskas "unleash Newton"


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/24346/panthers-need-to-turn-newton-loose

I think we can all agree that Cam Newton's passing hasn’t been very accurate in his first preseason games.

The Panthers believe that will come with time and experience. But, if they really are going to make Newton their opening-day starter -- and all indications are that’s the plan -- they need to take immediate advantage of the one thing Newton already does very well.

That’s run the ball. Check out this excellent Insider post by Chris Sprow. He’s got some incredible statistics that demonstrate just how special Newton is as a runner.

In his last preseason outing against Cincinnati, Newton tucked the ball and ran for a 16-yard touchdown. In the past four seasons, NFL quarterbacks have run for touchdowns of 15-plus yards an average of four times a year. Sprow did the math and it comes out to once in about 8,100 plays.

Also in that Cincinnati game, Newton had a 26-yard scramble. Last season, NFL quarterbacks combined 17 times to run 25 or more yards. That’s about once every 1,900 plays. Newton made both those plays within 15 minutes.

There’s a lot more where that came from, and the one thing the Panthers don’t need to do as they try to develop Newton’s passing skills is inhibit his ability to run. Through the years, there have been a lot of quarterbacks with good running ability who were discouraged from using it.

That’s understandable, because a lot of them were small and could get hurt in the open field. Newton is different. He’s bigger than defensive backs and roughly the same size as most linebackers.

He’s probably not going to get hurt running in the open field. If Newton’s going to get hurt, it likely will come on a play where he stays in the pocket too long and gets hit from the blind side by a defensive lineman.

There’s one way to avoid that. Let him run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree without even reading it yet. However, wait until the regular season and then start mixing in some designed runs and what not. In the preseason we need to let him throw as much as possible to try and get him comfortable in the pocket.

I think that has been the plan all along and I believe that is why he is likely going to start. Parts of the playbook have not been revealed yet.

Just my opinion. No NJPanther insider info though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been thinking about this and, assuming the coaching staff knows what it's doing, it doesn't make any sense for them to expect him to run the offense the way they've been doing in the preseason. It makes more sense (strategically and developmentally) to hide their real intentions for him and to give him game practice running stuff they'll want him to eventually. Due to the shortened training camp schedules, those preseason games were basically glorified scrimmages.

I'm not expecting it because it's too perfect, but I also wouldn't be surprised if they came out with a completely different game plan against Arizona. "You expected us to pass? HAHA! triple option time bitch."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:thumbsup:

Cam Newton should have the green light to run whenever he wants this season.

In a start last week versus the Bengals, rookie Panthers QB Cam Newton finished Carolina's first drive by scampering for a 16-yard touchdown. There was nothing special about the play, particularly if you've seen Newton play football for more than 15 minutes. On third-and-11 he took a shotgun snap, and at a hint of pressure he started to glide into Cincinnati's secondary, appearing slow, yet somehow faster than everyone else. He rolled off a hit from a safety he outweighs by 30 pounds and landed in the end zone. Fifteen minutes later, on third-and-8, Newton scrambled again, this time for 26 yards. Again, this seemed like nothing odd -- unless you're talking about the National Football League.

Over the last four seasons, NFL quarterbacks have run for touchdowns of 15-plus yards four times a year on average, according to Elias. That's about once per 8,100 plays. (Minus Michael Vick, it would be more like once per 12,000 plays.) And last year, NFL quarterbacks ran for 25 or more yards 17 total times, about once per 1,900 plays. Newton did something within 15 minutes of football that, statistically, should happen about once per 12,222 NFL games (approximately 48 years).

Find a sample size small enough, and you can argue anything. But that's just the point. This didn't seem odd at all, it was just typical Newton -- only the statistical improbablity looks odd. The quarterback looks the same. The question is whether this rare gift, combined with just average passing ability, can make him elite. The evidence says it might. It also says there's no reason Newton shouldn't run like crazy.

Before the NFL combine, Newton's personal QB coach discussed how Newton could compare to Ben Roethlisberger because of his ability to extend the play. "When you think of his feet as a weapon, you're thinking the wrong way," he told me. He meant that Newton's ability to run made him equally dangerous as a passer. He has Roethlisberger's size and arm, his coach argued, but even greater evasiveness. Bills GM Buddy Nix concurred: "Guys like that, they make your line look better, because tacklers can't get them down, and receivers look better, because they have time to get open."

The question is whether Newton should be backpedaling just to prove he can.

First, consider the precedent. There's an argument to be made that Newton was, for one season, the greatest running quarterback in college football history. Particularly when you consider that it wasn't even his primary function, and his team won a title. His 1,473 yards rushing ranks third all time in FBS, miles ahead of the single-season totals of plausible dual-threat NFL QBs -- like The Golden Calf of Bristol, Michael Vick, Brad Smith, Vince Young and Steve Young -- as well as pure running QBs like Tommie Frazier. When Auburn wanted to grind teams down, the quarterback didn't need to turn around and hand the ball off; he'd take his 6-foot-5, 250-pound frame and steer it into a linebacker as the clock ticked away on another Auburn win. At the same time, he was one interception from being college football's highest-rated passer last season; his 182.05 passer rating was good for the No. 2 spot, a hair behind Boise State's Kellen Moore.

When Newton was taken No. 1 overall, it really wasn't the second Vick-type pick at that spot, the latest runner-slash-passer who had to evolve. It was the first Cam Newton. Vick is a gifted athlete who can throw the ball, but because of his 6-foot, 210-pound frame, he terrifies his coaches when he takes hits as a runner. He's played 16 games in only one of his eight NFL seasons. Newton is a gifted athlete who can throw the ball, but he's 4 inches taller than Ray Lewis and about the same weight. Comparing Vick to Newton isn't apples and oranges, but Newton is a much, much bigger apple.

According to Total QBR, both of those runs last week were of great value, because of clutch-weighting. Both were third-down runs that picked up first downs and increased the Panthers' expected point total. In the case of the touchdown run, it also increased the actual point total. Newton will develop as a passer, but right now, the newer measurements of quarterback value recognize that yards are yards. Newton isn't a good running quarterback because he can pick up key yards with his feet, he's a good quarterback, just as Josh Freeman and Aaron Rodgers were last year as the league's best scrambling QBs.

This isn't to say Newton can't or won't throw. There are some reasons Newton can even succeed early as a passer:

• The shotgun conversion is often overstated. In 2010, 37.5 percent of all passes were from the shotgun. Is Peyton Manning less of a passer because he completed 74.5 percent of his throws last year from that formation?

• Newton's accuracy and reads are a question, but his fundamentals are largely in place.

• As Nix said, Newton's ability as a passer will often stem from extending the play, not just reading it. Great quarterbacks make good reads, but "The Catch" happened when the first few reads weren't there.

More likely, though, it'll be difficult for a while for Newton to be a good thrower, just as it is for any rookie quarterback. The accuracy isn't there yet, and it's a faster game in the NFL. You can see his head spinning. But in the push to develop him as a passer, Carolina's coaches shouldn't do a lot to hinder Newton's ability to totally change a game with his feet. "We have to really study him and watch him," Panthers head coach Ron Rivera said this week. In listening to Rivera, you wonder if he's trying to make up his mind not just on whether to start Newton, but on what he should ask him to be.

He should ask him Newton to be himself. The passing gains will come. In the meantime, telling Newton not to run would be to take away his one elite skill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...